Isn't Seattle only in the playoffs because of this win?
-
Isn't Seattle only in the playoffs because of this win? -
It's been shown pretty conclusively that Tate had his hands on the ball and two feet down before Jennings hit the ground, so he had possession and the TD counted. You could talk about him pushing off or the other refereeing blunders throughout the game, but the validity of the TD is probably the most over-discussed and boring thing that you could have started a thread about...Comment -
Good thing I didn't name the thread "Was this a TD....."Originally posted by suicidekingsComment -
Nobody talks about all the BS phantom 3rd down calls against Seattle to allow the Packers to score two of their FGs...Comment -
I'm sayin a Seattle vs. GB NFC Championship would make a great storyline/game after this happening early in the season. To see it come full-circle would be awesomeComment -
Originally posted by RAVENSFAN
would make the whole week full of rehashing a bunch of stupid shit...sounds great
Comment -
No.Originally posted by RAVENSFAN
Assuming a loss against GB, Seattle would be 10-6 along with Min & Chi. Sea would still be the 5 seed with tiebreakers.
A rematch would be a great. A 4th quarter game winning drive by Wilson would be even better.Comment -
Correct. In retrospect, the win gave Seattle no advantage in seeding. But, the GB-SF would be in GB this week.Originally posted by GP
I agree that a rematch would be hilarious if it ended on another dual possession with Packers still baffled by the rule.Comment
