Will anyone give moneylines on the #1 seeds over the #16s ???

[Fed_42420]

I'm sure they won't.....

[RPP]

Nope not a chance lol

[oiler]

but just imagine how high they would be if they did

[Crayzee]

check 5 dimes they give pretty high ml's

[iQon]

I'm 99.9% sure 5Dimes will. I don't use The Greek ATM but they seem to hang ML's on every game.

I don't see why they wouldn't put one up for that.

[BlastByou]

5 dimes does at -10000

[Jive]

5 dimes had them last year. I think they even had a ML for the Uconn women in the opening round. I remember it being the most absurd thing I had ever seen.

[Brian891]

itll be just like 1st round of nba playoffs. I remember the cavs were -10000 at bookmaker. I think they should do mls on 1 seeds. A 16 seed is bound to win one of these years, adn the astronomical cleanup books made would more than make up for losses of previous years.

[terpkeg]

The -10000 on Duke and Kansas is not a legitimate line when the comeback is +4000. There does seem to be legitimate MLs on the 2 seeds. If I recall last year correctly, the 1's were in the -3000 to -4500 range. Maybe im mistaken.

[yisman]

some books offer them, but the vig is of course tremendous.

I'd suggest parlaying the MLs for the 1s instead of betting them individually. Maybe even add the MLs for the 2s.

[Brian891]

jim rome predicted today that ucsb will beat florida, anyone gonna take a flier on that ml?

[face]

santa barbara beat up on long beach state and they were really good, i didn't see that coming. i could see the ucsb game being competitive at least.

[darko3131]

-10000 is laughable. Too bad Matchbook is gone. I got #1 Syracuse over #16 Vermont at -2000 last year.