Is 16.5 to much for a bad Wake Forest team to cover?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gators0708
    SBR MVP
    • 10-07-10
    • 2318

    #1
    Is 16.5 to much for a bad Wake Forest team to cover?
    Against a win less UNC Greensboro team?
  • Hanger
    SBR MVP
    • 01-25-09
    • 2115

    #2
    You're talking about a UNC Greensboro team only shooting 45% from the Field and allowing opponents to shoot 59% against them.

    Greensboro-24% Turnover rate, measly 43.5% on 2 pt shots, allowing their opponents to get 41% of the offensive rebound opportunities. Allowing teams to shot 56% on 2 pt shots. Allowing opponents to shoot 43% from 3 point land.

    Whereas, Wake is shooting 44% from 3 point land- 3rd best in CBB. Also a high turnover rate at 24% They dont put their opponents on the FT line very often, ranking 16th in that category.

    The problem with Wake is if they come out cold- 31% of their shots are behind the arc. If they come out cold or off, this could be a close game early.

    UNC Greensboro is in the bottom 100 in 6 out of 10 Offensive categories- Bottom 100 in 7 out of 10 Defensive Categories Whereas,
    Wake is in top 100 in 5 out of 10, but also in bottom 100 in 3 Offensive categories - Top 100 in 3 out of 10 Defensive categories, bottom 100 in 2 out of 10.

    Is the spread too much? Its possible- Is UNC Greensboro just that bad- also entirely, probably true.
    Comment
    • gators0708
      SBR MVP
      • 10-07-10
      • 2318

      #3
      I guess no play for me.
      Comment
      • 3GCOVERAGE
        SBR Sharp
        • 02-16-10
        • 257

        #4
        Im on Wake.... NC Greensboro is god awful
        Comment
        • gators0708
          SBR MVP
          • 10-07-10
          • 2318

          #5
          Are they worse then Ga Southern u think?
          Comment
          Search
          Collapse
          SBR Contests
          Collapse
          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
          Collapse
          Working...