was the first round big chalk last year?

[Crayzee]

i think so-
where can you check prev years vs spread?

this year looks same to me


wouldnt feel very confident in many dogs

[Chi_archie]

good question. all in all the parity was not the same.... as in I think the most talented teams WEREN'T as over the top talented as they are this year..... ie Kansas 10 < UNC 09

I feel like 3 out of 4 12 seeds upset 5 seeds, but again i'm pulling that out of my head which might as well be out of my ass at this point....

not sure where you can look it up.... let me know when you do though

[LT Profits]

Double-digit DOGS have been great bets in first round.

[ericthegangster]

look for an old gargatubracket on czabe.com

[TPowell]

LT, is that really true? I thought #1 seeds were like 10 games above .500 in the first round? I'm guessing the 2's and 3's are really bad?

[LT Profits]

http://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Articles/NCAA-Basketball/13574/march-madness-big-dogs-round-1-big-chalk-round-2.aspx

[LT Profits]

1-seeds are 78-73-2, 51.7% ATS overall in first round, 29-30-2 ATS when favored by double-digits.

[LT Profits]

Those numbers are since 2000-01.

[THE PROFIT]

Good info LT

[THE PROFIT]

I like Duke-22 but like ETSU+20

[suckerforparlays]

I like Duke-22 but like ETSU+20

People are hitting ETSU the line dropped half a point.

[THE PROFIT]

Better jump on the East Tennessee money train. Id never seen people out celebrating tonight for StPattys so happy for their team to take an ass whipping tomorrow & know it. We're just happy for the opportunity to get our ass whipped by Kentucky