Colorado state alert

Big Dave's Picks · 02-09-10, 04:58 PM

Good call sir I will have to check for the validity but I appreciate the information. Thanks Again Big Dave

KingKolzig · 02-09-10, 05:00 PM

ya no problem i was hot and bothered for CSU when i looked at the way the two teams are playing. i figured the line should really be CSU -6. not anymore. i still think CSU is a decent play, but not a gem like everyone thinks

No coincidences · 02-09-10, 05:05 PM

I wouldn't mess with this game, other than considering the under.

Big Dave's Picks · 02-09-10, 05:10 PM

Looked into this game a little further Air Force will be w/o Schafer and Stewart tonight one for injury the other for personal reasons. Parker however is listed as probable due to flu, he avg. 14 pts per game(leading scorer for Air Force). Hope this helps for everyone and BOL... Big Dave

Powderguy · 02-09-10, 05:12 PM

GL, I'd lean on Colorado St, but I'm staying away.

Big Dave's Picks · 02-09-10, 05:15 PM

Might be a good idea thier next game is against BYU at CSU maybe overlook tonight.

iceminers26 · 02-09-10, 05:15 PM

AF takes this one SU IMO, they have been playing better of late

PAPSMEAR · 02-09-10, 05:26 PM

AF without 2 key starters. even with them AF lose. AK are akin to the nets in the nba. fade against them with good quality teams and you will prosper. home court adavantage will not negate the underlying problem and that is, AF stink.

ron8698 · 02-09-10, 05:29 PM

Thanks KingKolzig for the update , colo st did look to good to be true . I still feel it`s a good pick . colo st beat utah 65-50 and air force lost 54-71 to utah . Also colo st beat tcu 63-57 and air force lost to them 50-59

iceminers26 · 02-09-10, 05:29 PM

Originally posted by PAPSMEAR

AF without 2 key starters. even with them AF lose. AK are akin to the nets in the nba. fade against them with good quality teams and you will prosper. home court adavantage will not negate the underlying problem and that is, AF stink.

You sound confident in the Rams, I just don't see it, but good luck.

iceminers26 · 02-09-10, 05:32 PM

Originally posted by ron8698

Thanks KingKolzig for the update , colo st did look to good to be true . I still feel it`s a good pick . colo st beat utah 65-50 and air force lost 54-71 to utah . Also colo st beat tcu 63-57 and air force lost to them 50-59

Not to sound negative, but when has this form of capping ever worked out well, so and so beat so and so by x amount so they should beat so and so by x amount.

Powderguy · 02-09-10, 05:33 PM

Air Force isn't equal to the Nets, wtf are you talking about.

FreakyD · 02-09-10, 05:40 PM

I seen the spread last night(-1.5) and jumped all over CSU thinking the spread would go up today. It was up to 2 before I logged off last night. I see it anywhere from 2-3 pts today. Starting to look like a trap game. It looks too easy, but let's hope not. Go CSU!

PAPSMEAR · 02-09-10, 05:41 PM

Originally posted by Powderguy

Air Force isn't equal to the Nets, wtf are you talking about.

not on sheer win/loss percentage of course. the way they approach the game. they lack skill, lack talent, lack depth, lack heart. all ingredients for being very profitable fade material. let's face it if we were talking about a double digit spread we wouldn't be having this discussion but we are talking about getting only 2 albeit at home against a far superior outfit. this is a gift. as the saying goes, don't look a gift horse in the mouth.

No coincidences · 02-09-10, 05:42 PM

Colorado State isn't a very good road team IMHO.

KingKolzig · 02-09-10, 05:45 PM

under no circumstance would i take air force, not even at +8.............and i wouldnt take CSU at -4, but at -2.5 i will take them on a small play. mainly cause of what big dave said about the roster outlook, flu ect

PAPSMEAR · 02-09-10, 05:54 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Colorado State isn't a very good road team IMHO.

agreed they are not a "very good road team" but there are very few teams that are. they are adequate which is sufficient against bad teams remembering that air force in the conf are 1-8 versus cs that are 5-4 (2-2 on the road). cs are playing good quality ball. not sure the same can be said for AF that are 1-8 SU in their last 9 games. apart from home court advantage which may be worth up to say 5 points for AF if you were to try and put a number on it, i just can't see AF turning around a 22 point caning last month.

anthonyc023 · 02-09-10, 05:56 PM

covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/ncb/players/player733728.html FProb Tues - Flu - 2/9/10notesParker is probable to play Tuesday against Colorado State with flu like symptoms. covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/ncb/players/player744444.html GQues Tues - Flu - 2/9/10

anthonyc023 · 02-09-10, 05:57 PM

2 starters with the flu and if you have ever played ball you know it is not easy to play being sick unless your michael jordan

PAPSMEAR · 02-09-10, 05:59 PM

i love when teams let players with flu like symptoms play. they run out of steam real quick and bring the whole team down. they have nothing to give in the second half especially when the chips are down

KingKolzig · 02-09-10, 06:39 PM

also who else has the flu on that team??? those two making out and its just them, or is the entire team like that

teecee · 02-09-10, 06:45 PM

This game is on the Streak for the Cash schedule. 99.4% are on the Rams. I stay away from plays that are on the Streak.

KingKolzig · 02-09-10, 06:52 PM

99.4 % of people think it will rain in seattle next april, might it still?

ron8698 · 02-10-10, 12:26 AM

match-ups worked out tonight

, way to go Rams

iceminers26 · 02-10-10, 12:28 AM

nice call, i was on the Falcons