The Princeton Attack Picks Season Long Thread!!!

[Maddhatter]

GL with today's card Hamm. Lovin the Ind St pick along with Pacers.

[southpaw74]

I can see some dogs bringing home the bacon tonight!! Just not sold on which ones yet? Hard to trust Oklahoma away from home and all bama has going for it is that they are at home.

[Hammew]

Here are my plays so far for Tuesday.

Clemson +2

Oklahoma +8

Illinois +5

Alabama +3

Indiana Pacers +7

Might have something else later. GL

[snapstick]

ADDED PICK:

Illinois +5

Where did you find this line? I track about 20 different books and this line never reached +5. Just curious because you should be accurate to your readers when you post a line.

[mandude]

What's your opinion on the Mizz St/Ind St game? Both teams have been struggling lately & with Lathan for Ind St being ?? for tonights game on the road makes me want to lean on Mizz St. I'm not too confident with them though. Any thoughts on this one? Probably should just leave this one alone. I really like Clem & Bama picks tonight. GL.

[snapstick]

Here are my plays so far for Tuesday.

Clemson +2

Oklahoma +8 (Never reached +8)

Illinois +5 (Never reached +5)

Alabama +3

Indiana Pacers +7 (Never reached +7)

Might have something else later. GL

Did you buy points with these lines you posted?

[BiffTFinancial]

all due respect, i think that Oklahoma opened at +8 at a number of books, and i know that the Greek has Pacers +7 right now.

[Hammew]

Did you buy points with these lines you posted?

Don't be a fukkin idiot again snappy. I play at bodog, now worry about lying about your record some more you flake.

[Hammew]

What's your opinion on the Mizz St/Ind St game? Both teams have been struggling lately & with Latham for Ind St being ?? for tonights game on the road makes me want to lean on Mizz St. I'm not too confident with them though. Any thoughts on this one? Probably should just leave this one alone. I really like Clem & Bama picks tonight. GL.

Not too sure. I was leaning Indiana St. but I never could fully convince myself.

[Hammew]

Where did you find this line? I track about 20 different books and this line never reached +5. Just curious because you should be accurate to your readers when you post a line.

Why don't you report me again you fukkin scab. People that post here all the time seem to do just fine. You will not gain any credibility by trying to attack mine.

[mandude]

I feel the same way. I think I'll just leave it alone. Like they say the best bet is no bet.

[southpaw74]

Don't be a fukkin idiot again snappy. I play at bodog, now worry about lying about your record some more you flake.

they are all .5 to 1 higher than I have but I'm more concerned about the side/reasoning and not the number GL Hamm

[snapstick]

Just had a question with which book offered these lines. No need to be defensive, thats not what adults do. You need to realize when you post lines others will try to find that line and if they cant they might wonder why certain lines are posted and from which site.

The Bodog lines at the time you posted the plays were:

Indiana +6.5
Alabama +3 (-115)
Clemson +1.5
Oklahoma +7.5
Illinois +4

My only question was did you buy points with every game you posted or just add a 1/2 point to them and 1 full point to Alabama. Just a simple question that required a explanation thats all. No need to get mad if you post inacurate lines all of them at which increased your line with the team you played.

[snapstick]

No reason to call names. If they are legit than thats all you have to say. Im not saying your not credible but with your response i guess you dont have an answer and thats fine. A little word of wisdom dont respond making yourself look foolish we are all adults here i think. GL

[Hammew]

No reason to call names. If they are legit than thats all you have to say. Im nt saying your not credible but with your response i guess you dont have an answer and thats fine. A little word of wisdom dont respond making yourself look foolish we are all adults here i think. GL

I am not making myself look foolish, you came in here and tried to be Mr. Sharp again, but you are as dull as a butterknife. If people have a problem with my thread, don't read it. I could care less. It is obvious that wont happen, because I consistently win games. You post one pick a day and can't do better than 50%. How many times have you restarted your record in the past 3 months snappy? I can count more than 4, then I stopped checking because you reported me to Willie Bee for saying something. So once again I tell you this, we can settle this by a challenge and I will knock you in the dirt or you can stay outta my thread just like I was told by Willie Bee to stay out of yours. Put your capping skills where your mouth is. Hit that little challenge button under my name if you want see who is better.

[nobodyukno]

Im going with Tennessee at -3 just because I feel like at +3 your thinking Alabama is going to win straight up which I cant see happening. As said before, cant see Purdue keep losing so I have them at -4.5. With you on Clemson +2 though.

[smvmuscle]

i can confirm on a book i follow current line

OK +8

[snapstick]

I am not making myself look foolish, you came in here and tried to be Mr. Sharp again, but you are as dull as a butterknife. If people have a problem with my thread, don't read it. I could care less. It is obvious that wont happen, because I consistently win games. You post one pick a day and can't do better than 50%. How many times have you restarted your record in the past 3 months snappy? I can count more than 4, then I stopped checking because you reported me to Willie Bee for saying something. So once again I tell you this, we can settle this by a challenge and I will knock you in the dirt or you can stay outta my thread just like I was told by Willie Bee to stay out of yours. Put your capping skills where your mouth is. Hit that little challenge button under my name if you want see who is better.

Sounds like a teenager talking. I guess for all who might be wondering we wont get a intelligent response and thats fine. Go ahead and add points to your plays thats ok with me. As far as your challenge...thats funny....your not in the same league and i will leave it at that. GL with your plays

[Hammew]

Just had a question with which book offered these lines. No need to be defensive, thats not what adults do. You need to realize when you post lines others will try to find that line and if they cant they might wonder why certain lines are posted and from which site.

The Bodog lines at the time you posted the plays were:

Indiana +6.5
Alabama +3 (-115)
Clemson +1.5
Oklahoma +7.5
Illinois +4

My only question was did you buy points with every game you posted or just add a 1/2 point to them and 1 full point to Alabama. Just a simple question that required a explanation thats all. No need to get mad if you post inacurate lines all of them at which increased your line with the team you played.

Once again your true ignorance shines through your weak exterior. I have bama as a +3. You are such a fool.

[snapstick]

I guess i wont get an answer to my question about your posted lines. Thats fine no biggie. GL

[Hammew]

Just so the readers of my thread know, I have challenged Snapstick, but he will not accept because I am not on his level. I act like a teenager when I am attacked about me lying about lines. If you can't find my numbers go sign up at bodog.

[snapstick]

Once again your true ignorance shines through your weak exterior. I have bama as a +3. You are such a fool.

and the others including the point that was added on the Illinois play? I dont care you should just post accurate lines thats all i was saying. GL to you.

[snapstick]

Just so the readers of my thread know, I have challenged Snapstick, but he will not accept because I am not on his level. I act like a teenager when I am attacked about me lying about lines. If you can't find my numbers go sign up at bodog.

lol..This is funny...what does a challenge have to do with the question i asked about your lines? Is that a response to the question? Sounds like the numbers got fudged a little and thats fine. I didnt attack you i asked for a explanation which you cant give. Thats ok. And i do have a bodog account and i posted the lines in post #1168.

[Hammew]

and the others including the point that was added on the Illinois play? I dont care you should just post accurate lines thats all i was saying. GL to you.

Illinois is at a +4 on bodog are you ignorant???

[Hammew]

lol..This is funny...what does a challenge have to do with the question i asked about your lines? Is that a response to the question? Sounds like the numbers got fudged a little and thats fine. I didnt attack you i asked for a explanation which you cant give. Thats ok.

You are such a bitch, go back to your six kids that you have to take care of and leave me alone. All my numbers are on bodog, and I bought the hook when it is offered. You are the liar and I wish you would accept the challenge, if I fudge my numbers then you should have no problem beating me in a contest. But you wont accept, because you know I would absolutely make you look as inept as I know you are.

[Busterflywheel]

OK damn sure did reach 8..Thats where I got it at Pinn and Bodog at one point for about 1 hr..

[snapstick]

Here are my plays so far for Tuesday.

Clemson +2

Oklahoma +8

Illinois +5

Alabama +3

Indiana Pacers +7

Might have something else later. GL

I mean the Illinois play you posted above at +5. That was the line i was asking about that was +4 when you posted. My mistake it wasnt bama. Im done i made my point and i think i got what i thought i would from you.

[Hammew]

I mean the Illinois play you posted above at +5. My mistake it wasnt bama.

Date placed:
Jan 19, 2010 4:26pSingle #165775989 (Placed by Web)Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point Spread
(518) Illinois +5 (-125) Tue@9:00p
Competitor517) PurdueBought 0.5 points
Risk to win US$

[snapstick]

You are such a bitch, go back to your six kids that you have to take care of and leave me alone. All my numbers are on bodog, and I bought the hook when it is offered. You are the liar and I wish you would accept the challenge, if I fudge my numbers then you should have no problem beating me in a contest. But you wont accept, because you know I would absolutely make you look as inept as I know you are.

There ya go brah! Thats all you had to say. Easy wasnt it. We all learn something everyday.

[Hammew]

GL with today's card Hamm. Lovin the Ind St pick along with Pacers.

GL today mad, hopefully we get a couple covers today.

[Hammew]

There ya go brah! Thats all you had to say. Easy wasnt it. We all learn something everyday.

Hey brah, I don't answer to a wannabe like you. When it comes to handicapping, you couldn't carry my jock. Believe that.

[Busterflywheel]

http://www.sbrodds.com/#/odds/ncaab/game/pointspread.html

[snapstick]

GL with your plays tonight. As far as your challenge...be carefull what you ask for....i play sports to increase my roll which i do a pretty damn good job doing. When you do this for a 2nd income you let me know

[snapstick]

Hey brah, I don't answer to a wannabe like you. When it comes to handicapping, you couldn't carry my jock. Believe that.

If i woulda known you were an 18 yr old i wouldnt have posted here. GL

[Hammew]

Look Snapstick, people will read this and I am pretty sure they will see through all your BS the same way I did. You already turned me in once because I straight had you admit that you restarted your record. So you come in here and try to make yourself look cool by questioning my posted lines which in turn questions my integrity. Because a person with integrity would not post a false line or a false record in your case. Everybody here does the contests and beat the prick but every time I challenge a shit talker like yourself one on one they back down. I bet you backed down from everything in your life. The had a name for people like you in the old west... Yellow bellied.