Now pace picking the hell up,, afraid the 1st half was too shitty for it to matter tho. Maybe if it stays reasonably close we can get benefit of the foul game at the end., need a lightning ass pace now tho.
-
Comment -
Gl broComment -
Didn't expect them to cover really, just expected the to score a lot more. That game was way more of a grind than it should have been when looking at both teams seasons,, drake zoned them up and really slowed the game down which I didn't expect considering how easily most teams have lit them up., oh well, onward and upward!Comment -
Another split yesterday going
1-1.
Season total: 87-70Comment -
Good Luck today BankerComment -
Murry st -2.. square me the fukk up, once again it appears someone or some group thinks way more highly of slu than they should as once again slu taking money to keep this a one possession spread which as I continue to say, makes no fukkin sense to me!!! Racers just beat a solid illi st team on the road, they demolished wright st on the road who I think comparable to slu rankings wise. Don't see any reason racers can't once again handle their business on the road here vs a not very good slu team we gonna continue to fade while they getting more respect that they deserve. Racers don't put teams on the ft line and that really slu's best offense, if you can defend them without fouling they will struggle to score. For slu to win they need a significant advantage at the charity stripe and I just don't see that happening here.Comment -
Michigan/Texas under 129.5.. looks like another real grind it out affair here. Both teams play slow and both calling cards are defense. Longhorns are 6th in the nation in defensive efficiency while wolverines a respectable 44th. Both teams incredibly poor ft shooters which a nice added bonus. I think we have a very comparable game to look at here, when Texas faced butler in the pk80 that game ended with 109 points total and Michigan plays even slower than the bulldogs with very comparable defensive numbers. Wolverines weakness is defending the 3 but Texas doesn't have the shooters really capable of exploiting this. I see a game playing in low 60s so a good 4-5 points of value off my number.Comment -
Sea will win at home More worried about at Dallas zeke backComment -
i took the ML just to be safe. banj, what do you think about taking columbia for a let down against BC? i feel like +11.5 is perfect and public is all over BC with that win over duke. columbia has played tough teams and has lost by 10 twice, one to nova and one to penn stComment -
I prefer playing Columbia more when they face teams with poor perimeter defense as they chuck a lot of 3s. Bc should be able to get whatever they want on the offensive end so really gonna be counting on lions to shoot really well from behind the arc to hang in it. They lost by 14 to pen st and they lost by 10 at home to Stony Brook which little concerning, if their shot not falling they don't have much of any other plan of attack. Bc only allowing opponents to shoot 31% from behind the arc so not sure I want to count on Columbia to hit contested jumpers. I'm not much into situational bets, I suppose you could get a letdown here but I think so hard to gauge that kind of thing, certainly makes sense they wouldn't be as jacked for this game but who's to say that win doesn't springboard them as it boast their confidence? I honestly don't know, I know others that much better picking situational spots than me so not saying can't be done just isn't really my style. Just looking at the 2 teams I don't think it a great matchup for lions. It a pass for me, gl if you play it.Comment -
Gl bankerComment -
Comment -
Not saying I'm playing it but that yale/Iona total getting awful high!Comment -
2daBank, goodluck! ! !Comment -
Banker. Your thoughts please on Cincinnati -12.5 (rose from 11.5)? I’m torn?Comment -
Banker thoughts on Albany +1 at Memphis?Comment -
I dunno, I have no doubt bearcats will win, your guess as good as mine if they cover. First trip away from starksville for bulldogs and they have played mostly cream puffs. I have no doubt their numbers fraudulent just not sure how much so? Obviously they not gonna get no where near the 62% they been shooting inside the arc against this cincy defense. Biggest question for me is their interior defense really that good or just product of facing smaller teams? Jacksonville st has pretty good size and interior scoring and they held them to 42%. If the defense real think it too many points, prob goes under too, I'm just not sure it is?Comment -
Mf'er. Another under I should have waited on, hopefully once again it won't matter. Wtf is wrong with folks driving these lines the wrong direction? They retarded or something?? lolComment -
yo banker what do you think about the Jackrabbits tonight?Comment -
Murray st done..
being outscored 24-6 in the second so far..Comment -
They will figure it outComment -
12/13
Houston/lsu over 155.. neither teams calling card is defense, tigers in particular play really crappy d. Every legit team tigers have faced hung a big number on them, even Michigan put up 77 and they slow paced and not that great offensively. Expect Houston to get into the 80s here and think tigers will be right there with them as their size should allow them decent looks down low. Last year lsu won in a blowout so game ended at 149, expect Houston to be far more competitive here in a game I think plays into the 160s..Comment -
Garbage Mfers went from a 13 point lead early to getting their asses kicked by a shit slu team, way to go on my list as being pure garbage Murray st.Comment -
Weak team - bunch of pussiesComment -
Yea man I dunno. They go and beat solid illi st team then get their shit pushed in vs this garbage slu team? It was one thing when siu blew a game to slu, they kinda suck so didn't surprise me that much. Didn't think racers were so terrible but they sure looked like pure garbage tonight. Was only second road game so not like it was their 3rd or 4th in a row, beats me? Shit happens I guess.Comment