Washington st. + 11.5

ReconSnarff · 03-12-14, 08:09 PM

I like this play. Might be on it later.

ReconSnarff · 03-12-14, 11:00 PM

I'm on this with you. Looking pretty good.

farmhouse1 · 03-12-14, 11:05 PM

Was leaning washington st with the points. But been on a good run tonight decided just to quite while im ahead

ReconSnarff · 03-13-14, 12:41 AM

I think these refs towards the end of this game are on the take. Lane violation with 2:30 left? Really?

ReconSnarff · 03-13-14, 12:49 AM

This Washington State coach is going to keep fouling...such a tool.

ReconSnarff · 03-13-14, 12:51 AM

Nevermind. Cash it. That really shouldn't have been that close. If Stanford plays anyone that knows how to play defense and double team the only player that can score (Randle), then fade Stanford.

THam12 · 03-13-14, 12:57 AM

Glad I bought the cardinal down to -10

ReconSnarff · 03-13-14, 01:01 AM

Originally posted by THam12

Glad I bought the cardinal down to -10

Awesome. But it really shouldn't have been that close like I said. I never would pay 1.5 point juice on a spread like that.

THam12 · 03-13-14, 01:03 AM

I would. If I see that Stanford will win by somewhere around 11-12 like I did, I will buy it and hit it. Doesn't matter. A win is a win, a loss is a loss in my book. I guess others are different. But this time of year, the juice isn't all that bad for a win.

farmhouse1 · 03-13-14, 01:38 AM

Wth

How did washington st not cover 11

max58 · 03-13-14, 05:12 AM

was st. gets max paid