Lucky1's Hoops Week#19

[iloseagain]

Colorado State+3

hmmm im on the other side for my big play.. BOL

[Lucky1g]

South Florida+2

[AlCar G.]

Holy shit!!! I got one right. I was liking them a lot and it seems everyone is on the other side. Plus, another good friend of mine who is a very good capper is on them. Lucky I absolutely love your style. You bet the bets that take the biggest balls to bet. NOONE will can deter you from a play you have committed to. HUGE ones my friend!!!!

Good luck to us all!!!

[TakingVegasMoney]

Cash VT,!!! Great start lucky. Thanks man! Too many more!

[Lucky1g]

Fordham+5

[Lift2beFit]

Nice start earlier, VT had their number all game
BOL to the rest of your day

[iloseagain]

grambling st had lost by 2 and 3 to texas southern during the year and then they lose by 25 today haha.. oh well what are ya gona do.. nice pick on vtech

[TenCount]

I'm wondering if Lucky or anyone else on here adheres to the betting rule where you should only bet on a certain amount of games to give yourself a better chance mathematically for a profit. It goes something like:

Play five games and you need three winners and two losers to make a profit. This is 60 percent winners. And 60 percent winners is considered to be the standard for measuring a winning and losing season. Seven games is 4-3 or 57 percent winners. Nine games is 5-4 or 55 percent winners. Eleven games is 6-5 or 54 percent winners. Fifteen games is 8-7 or 53 percent winners and twenty-one games is 11-10 or 52.38 winners needed to make a profit.

The wrong number of plays to make is two, three or four games. Play only two games and you need 2-0 or 100 percent winners to make a profit. Play three games and you need 2-1 or 66 percent winners just to make .9 percent of a profit. Play four games and you need 3-1 or 75 percent winners to make a profit.

[iloseagain]

I'm wondering if Lucky or anyone else on here adheres to the betting rule where you should only bet on a certain amount of games to give yourself a better chance mathematically for a profit. It goes something like:

Play five games and you need three winners and two losers to make a profit. This is 60 percent winners. And 60 percent winners is considered to be the standard for measuring a winning and losing season. Seven games is 4-3 or 57 percent winners. Nine games is 5-4 or 55 percent winners. Eleven games is 6-5 or 54 percent winners. Fifteen games is 8-7 or 53 percent winners and twenty-one games is 11-10 or 52.38 winners needed to make a profit.

The wrong number of plays to make is two, three or four games. Play only two games and you need 2-0 or 100 percent winners to make a profit. Play three games and you need 2-1 or 66 percent winners just to make .9 percent of a profit. Play four games and you need 3-1 or 75 percent winners to make a profit.

that makes no sense. its not about day to day, its about your overall record.

[chunk]

I'm wondering if Lucky or anyone else on here adheres to the betting rule where you should only bet on a certain amount of games to give yourself a better chance mathematically for a profit. It goes something like:

Play five games and you need three winners and two losers to make a profit. This is 60 percent winners. And 60 percent winners is considered to be the standard for measuring a winning and losing season. Seven games is 4-3 or 57 percent winners. Nine games is 5-4 or 55 percent winners. Eleven games is 6-5 or 54 percent winners. Fifteen games is 8-7 or 53 percent winners and twenty-one games is 11-10 or 52.38 winners needed to make a profit.

The wrong number of plays to make is two, three or four games. Play only two games and you need 2-0 or 100 percent winners to make a profit. Play three games and you need 2-1 or 66 percent winners just to make .9 percent of a profit. Play four games and you need 3-1 or 75 percent winners to make a profit.

This is so wrong that I don't even know where to begin.

[thecutter]

I'm wondering if Lucky or anyone else on here adheres to the betting rule where you should only bet on a certain amount of games to give yourself a better chance mathematically for a profit. It goes something like:

Play five games and you need three winners and two losers to make a profit. This is 60 percent winners. And 60 percent winners is considered to be the standard for measuring a winning and losing season. Seven games is 4-3 or 57 percent winners. Nine games is 5-4 or 55 percent winners. Eleven games is 6-5 or 54 percent winners. Fifteen games is 8-7 or 53 percent winners and twenty-one games is 11-10 or 52.38 winners needed to make a profit.

The wrong number of plays to make is two, three or four games. Play only two games and you need 2-0 or 100 percent winners to make a profit. Play three games and you need 2-1 or 66 percent winners just to make .9 percent of a profit. Play four games and you need 3-1 or 75 percent winners to make a profit.

Its a shame you just showed up today. You missed out on a lot of money!

[AlCar G.]

that makes no sense. its not about day to day, its about your overall record.

You are exactly right brother. You beat me to it.

[TenCount]

We'll begin then that's why I asked the question

[mikmik]

So fade away dummy

[TenCount]

Yeah it would be pretty dumb to force a bet just to get the odds now that I think of it lmfao

[thecutter]

To address the point of discipline which I feel is half of your point. No, I have no self control. I've already before 7pm doubled luckys amt of bets. Luckily I'm still up but Im taking confidence into the evening that he's got a few winners posted. Give it a whirl

[TenCount]

C'mon dude I was just asking a ? Grow up

[Lift2beFit]

Lets not turn Lucky's thread into a kids playpen fellas. You guys wanna argue please do us a favor and make your own thread on the subject. We are all in it for the same reason my friends, remember that!

[Rous]

I cant believe Colorado St. is ganna blow this.....

[AlCar G.]

C'mon dude I was just asking a ? Grow up

No worries my friend. Let it go guys, we're all on different levels and trying to learn.

[thecutter]

Not arguing I'm genuinely trying to get him to tail lol

[TiredPro]

Just remember Tencount, the less you bet, the more you lose, when you win.

[mikmik]

The fvcking guy has proved himself all plays documented and you come in questioning.

[thecutter]

Yeah wow 13 pt run in 75 seconds

[TenCount]

The fvcking guy has proved himself all plays documented and you come in questioning.

What are you talking about? I just asked a question about what he thinks of that theory. In no way was I questioning anything he does. Can u read?

[mikmik]

Why even question? The guy does nothing but win so why question?

[thecutter]

Ouch that was the worst beat In a while. Couldn't even get a push Utah st was ice at the line

[Rous]

what a melt downnnnnnn

[mikmik]

Yea horrible. What can you do.

[TenCount]

Ok I'll just leave. I was just trying pick someone's brain that is obviously a very accomplished handicapper. In no way was I trying to question, argue or disrespect him or anyone else in this thread. Jesus

[Rous]

you mushed CSU......so please leave.

[Salmonman]

What a bunch of chokers

[thecutter]

A10 tournament starting. Used to have it at the boardwalk hall right down the street from where I grew up in Atlantic city(now u know why I gamble) used to pay 40 bucks and watch 4 games all day then they moved it to friggin Brooklyn last year. Sucks

[chunk]

I like the A10. Balanced and competitive.

[bababooey13]

csu was the worst beat ive seen all year