2013-14 NCAA Hoops thread

[ebbearsfb1]

good luck coin and trinity honestly the best thing to do if you have the ability is to just wait and live bet a lot of these games.. i was doing that yesterday. obviously it only works if your able to watch the games directly to get a feel of what is going on, it also helps you get a better line sometimes early in the game

[bringdownthehous]

nocoin...total on mercer/duke seems low no? 140.5 for game 66 for 1h....two teams that avg 80 a pop...thoughts on 1h under?

[No coincidences]

good luck coin and trinity honestly the best thing to do if you have the ability is to just wait and live bet a lot of these games.. i was doing that yesterday. obviously it only works if your able to watch the games directly to get a feel of what is going on, it also helps you get a better line sometimes early in the game

Agree live betting is better. Unfortunately I won't have access to it for the next few days starting early this afternoon.

[No coincidences]

nocoin...total on mercer/duke seems low no? 140.5 for game 66 for 1h....two teams that avg 80 a pop...thoughts on 1h under?

Don't do totals, but yeah, it seems a little low. Beware.

Baylor/Nebraska under 132 looks good to go.

[ebbearsfb1]

Agree live betting is better. Unfortunately I won't have access to it for the next few days starting early this afternoon.

understandable i am lucky to be off today so it works out.

i kind of like mercer, and baylor, but baylor i wouldnt lay 180 on them would rather see the flow early. plus there is always the drew factor

[ebbearsfb1]

as far as the totals go.. from the games yesterday it seemed like there was a few games where teams started out super hot and you could of got out of wack totals.

I was able to get 132 on the harvard game, same thing with wisconsin early in

[No coincidences]

understandable i am lucky to be off today so it works out.

i kind of like mercer, and baylor, but baylor i wouldnt lay 180 on them would rather see the flow early. plus there is always the drew factor

Baylor should, in theory, roll.

I've seen them enough this year -- along with how well Miles has molded this Nebraska team -- to just lay off.

[bringdownthehous]

Don't do totals, but yeah, it seems a little low. Beware.

Baylor/Nebraska under 132 looks good to go.

Thanks, agreed. Ill sit and wait on the games live. Good luck today

[ebbearsfb1]

Baylor should, in theory, roll.

I've seen them enough this year -- along with how well Miles has molded this Nebraska team -- to just lay off.

exactly.. Ideally I'd like to see one team get off to a hot start.. and be able to catch 6 or 7 points if it doesnt work out that way. there is always other action today though



it looks like i missed the boat on tennessee though up to a 6 point favorite.. reminds me of minnesota ucla last year in the 11/6 game

[ebbearsfb1]

ended up with under 15.5 first 5 for some action in this early game very small and can live bet from there.


seems odd that the total keeps dropping.. with that sad. i expect to see some cold droughts in this games from these teams.. I think Mercer might start cold also because of the lay off

[ebbearsfb1]

Lol.. no defense outta either team.. not sure why the total kept dropping like that then


its what i get for making an action play...

10 points in the first minute and a half.. bet loses by .5 nice

[No coincidences]

Should've known better than to trust this group of NM players again.

Two straight years of complete and utter NCAA Tourney choke jobs.

[No coincidences]

When Baylor is clicking, they're as good as anyone.

Too bad Drew can't figure out how to harness all of that talent.

[KRIT]

Should've known better than to trust this group of NM players again.

Two straight years of complete and utter NCAA Tourney choke jobs.

Lobos are good, they did run into a good Stanford team. Both were under-seeded. I still think Lobos make a game out of it, still early.

[No coincidences]

Lobos are good, they did run into a good Stanford team. Both were under-seeded. I still think Lobos make a game out of it, still early.

I don't buy that. Like Randle, but they aren't anything special and Dawkins is a sub-par coach. No reason for the Lobos to struggle in this game, especially with that front line.

[No coincidences]

Duke choking late. No surprise there to anyone who watched them over the last few months of the season. I figured that would lead to a Mercer backdoor cover -- not SU victory. Loving this.

[No coincidences]

At least I beat the closer by 70 cents on the NM line.

[KRIT]

At least I beat the closer by 70 cents on the NM line.

Had a feeling there was something weird about this line when a lot of books dropped to 2.5 last night and pinny was hanging NM ML at -145.

And same here, I took NM ML at -150 and thought I came out like a bandit when I saw it close at -215, not feeling that smart anymore.

[No coincidences]

Louisiana-Lafayette +14 (2.3U to win 2)
Eastern Kentucky +13 (1.15U to win 1)

[No coincidences]

Had a feeling there was something weird about this line when a lot of books dropped to 2.5 last night and pinny was hanging NM ML at -145.

And same here, I took NM ML at -150 and thought I came out like a bandit when I saw it close at -215, not feeling that smart anymore.

Agree.

Something I've learned from wasting my time in this racket -- anytime you kill the closer on a public play, it means absolutely nothing. In fact, in the future, if you get an outstanding number on a public play with a lot of steam, buy out as quickly as possible.

[No coincidences]

Memphis -180 (3.6U to win 2)

[KRIT]

Lobos close the half within 5. To hedge or not to hedge?

On both Eastern Kentucky and Louisiana Lafeyette with you.

[No coincidences]

Louisiana-Lafayette +14 (2.3U to win 2)
Eastern Kentucky +13 (1.15U to win 1)

Adding 2U to ULL live +9.

[No coincidences]

Lobos close the half within 5. To hedge or not to hedge?

I didn't. I should have.

[KRIT]

Yeah I didn't hedge either.

Doesn't the OKST-Zags line/line movement look similar to what happened with UNM/Stanford line? Can Zags do it even thoguh they suck?

[No coincidences]

Well, had a pretty decent weekend record-wise in the games I did bet (was limited by time and resources). However, Wichita State crushed me yesterday. Got the line early at -2.5 and the ML at -165. Absolutely crushed the closer (again), yet got absolutely crushed on the play (again).

[No coincidences]

Nebraska-Omaha +6 (3.3U to win 3)

[No coincidences]

Princeton +3.5 (2.2U to win 2)

[No coincidences]

Princeton +3.5 (2.2U to win 2)

Adding two units to this.

[No coincidences]

Southern Miss +5 (3.24U to win 3)

[RavensFan2k3]

I always check your plays, you're last couple have been alittle off. I like this play, but how good you feeling about this one?

[PAULYPOKER]

Southern Miss +5 (3.24U to win 3)

Lang 3/25

Southern miss over Minnesota

Nomination(s):

This post was nominated 2 times . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: peppermillrick, and zoomer

[No coincidences]

Southern Miss was in completely control, then just gave up 10 points in like 70 seconds.

[No coincidences]

This bet is dead and gone. Southern Miss has completely collapsed.

[No coincidences]

A 32-11 run. Disgusting.