Syracuse and Under is a correlated parlay as is the converse.

[neutral]

4/6

Syracuse +2.5 [3.3x]

& Under 131.5 [2.2x]

[Played this earlier this week, this result is correlated so if you can find books taking correlated parlay, place it]

[Easy-Rider 66]

Guess you are banking on that Orange 2-3 Match UP Zone. Not a bad angle.

[Dirty D]

Correlated parlays have worked out good for me in regular season games when the grind is on and the performances are somewhat correlated. Not sure the final four is a good spot for one though. Michigan has the best tools to crack the zone and that very important week to prepare for it. That said, I like both of your sides but I just want to wait and bet this one in-game.

[neutral]

Guess you are banking on that Orange 2-3 Match UP Zone. Not a bad angle.

Yes in addition to their athleticism and length. I noted in another thread that Michigan barely scored when Florida went to 2-3 zone. Also I expect them to push out to Staukaus when he goes to wing as team in the big10 did to him in the 2nd half of the season. Also Burke sometimes over dribbles, against zone that is not wise, you have to beat zone with the quality ball movement as a team not dribbling.

[Brebos]

wrong topic

[casinobones]

Correlated parlays have worked out good for me in regular season games when the grind is on and the performances are somewhat correlated. Not sure the final four is a good spot for one though. Michigan has the best tools to crack the zone and that very important week to prepare for it. That said, I like both of your sides but I just want to wait and bet this one in-game.

Pardon my ? but What exactly is a correlated parlay? Is it like a If bet? If the game goes under the total your Syracuse play of +2.5 is in play and/or vise versa if Syracuse covers the +2.5 you also automatically have a under play that kicks in? making it a parlay of Cuse +2.5 & Under the total? Is this correct? thanks....