Betting every under is profitable in the first round right?

Chum Slam · 03-22-13, 08:13 AM

ANybody?

Easy-Rider 66 · 03-22-13, 08:17 AM

Not sure about the last 15 years. But I do believe the public shades toward overs. Yesterday if you played every under you went 10-6. Not bad.

coop · 03-22-13, 08:30 AM

I mean the public obviously prefers the over, who wants to be the guy with his buddies cheering for missed shots?

but I dont really get this theory. It's assuming that the public is moving every single line up? or that Vegas makes them intentionally high to begin with knowing no one will bet under? in both cases wouldn't the lines get raped by the sharps back to where they should be?

biggerleaffan · 03-22-13, 08:38 AM

Ya, I bet the under in all 32 games. I only backtracked the past 2 years and it profited every time.

Easy-Rider 66 · 03-22-13, 08:40 AM

Originally posted by coop

I mean the public obviously prefers the over, who wants to be the guy with his buddies cheering for missed shots?

but I dont really get this theory. It's assuming that the public is moving every single line up? or that Vegas makes them intentionally high to begin with knowing no one will bet under? in both cases wouldn't the lines get raped by the sharps back to where they should be?

Not sure about the NCAA tournament but I do believe Vegas ups the total in the Super Bowl by about 3 points most years from what they would post on a regular season game.

gopolks · 03-22-13, 08:40 AM

I always bet over, there is always going to be one player that gets hot.