Vegas is scarily accurate sometimes.....

[BlitzTheBooks]

These are first half TOTALS from some of today's games:


Iona/Fairfield: Vegas - 67, actual 67
Norfolk/Hampton: Vegas 62, actual 64
Georgia St/W&M: Vegas 64, actual 65
Hofstra/Drexel: Vegas 54, actual 56

Spreads are impressive to nail, but being that close on totals is jaw-dropping

[mdunlap3]

Some would say "that's why they get paid the big bucks"

[2daBank]

id bet those 1st half totals come down to last possession at least 50% of the time,,,def some good ol fashion degen fun

[2014millionaire]

thats why 95% of sports bettors lose money

[TwoWays]

And the times vegas way off the line, which is often. What do we say then?

[thfootball]

most of the time we say, fruck

[BlitzTheBooks]

And the times vegas way off the line, which is often. What do we say then?

Topic wasn't about how often they're right or wrong. It was pointing out how accurate they can be at times.

[Magnificent]

anytime I've seen a SWAC or MEAC game on the board...I've noticed the totals are sharp sharp...for both halves...I have noticed this about 4 times this year...I dont think those conferences are offered up too much, but like I said...sharp sharp totals