I don't get this line at all , USC/UCLA Total is 143???

[Louisvillekid1]

These teams always play in the 50's/60's when they meet and Bazz and Wear are banged up for UCLA...

I thought this line would be like 131, Boy I was off.

[numismatist]

I was looking at the under too LK. Maybe the books are thinking UCLA blowout...lots of points and fouls in the 2nd half?

[Big Bear]

under?

[Louisvillekid1]

I'm going to sit it out, but I yeah strong lean towards the under...

[yisman]

I was looking at the under too LK. Maybe the books are thinking UCLA blowout...lots of points and fouls in the 2nd half?

if it's a blowout, there probably won't be a lot of fouls in the second half

[Big Bear]

under looks fukked neither team plays any defense

[Louisvillekid1]

well I guess i get the line now...

[ebbearsfb1]

Not the usc of kevin o neil

[Louisvillekid1]

no doubt

[Big Bear]

I'm going to sit it out, but I yeah strong lean towards the under...

saw this too late got fukked by overtime

[Louisvillekid1]

Unreal they score 16 in OT and still only cover the line by a few points...

Tough one, I knew that was high

[yisman]

USC has played very different this season, partially thanks to the coaching change. They used to be one of the slowest (tempo-wise) teams in college. Each season they had a top defense and a very slow team. Not the case this season.