im thinking about taking both of those.chicago was playing really good without rose and why all of a sudden they wont be able to cover vs philly.i think chicago is too strong for philly.and total 176,its low,i mean 176,they should be able to cover it without any problems,i mean for them not to score 180 points,it should be really low scoring game.i mean to teke under,u have to think that they will score around 165-170.i dont know it seems over is a good play and -6.5 will be covered.anyway share your opinon.what do you think guys and lets punish bookies.lol
-
-
I'd be a little scared about the over just because the bulls know how important defense is going to be without rose on offense.Comment -
Bulls and under bri trust me over will foil ur betComment -
Bulls and under bro trust me over will foil ur betComment -
may be u right on the total,i still think that they will cover.may be small bet.but i think chicago-6.5 and la -5.5 should cover the spread and will probably buy half a point.not betting celtics game.Comment -
I like the under, but tough to take bulls/under on a parlay. Youre going against correlation that wayComment -
i dont do parleys,odds against you.the best way to win is 1 bet at a time.parley is for fun.Comment -
Dima. Under in CHI/PHI. But I think you have the side right.
I'm thinking CHI -6.5 and Under 176.Comment -
ok guys i probably will not touch total,thanks to everybody.Comment
