Lakers ML, Who's with me?

[bsutphi]

Lakers facing a lot of adversity. They just had that "players only" meeting. The revenge factor from last year's Western Conference finals. I know they struggle on the road, but this game has upset written all over it. Agree?

[nick86]

too risky. i don't play like a square. i only bet if i have a really good feeling about it

[pint86]

Went ATS.

Don't have the balls to go for road dogs ML yet.

Lets hit it!

[GoBlue77]

too risky. i don't play like a square. i only bet if i have a really good feeling about it

nothing square about lakers on the road

[nick86]

nothing square about lakers on the road

my definition of a square is someone who takes chances when logic is saying not to

[bsutphi]

Lakers may be the square pick. But I've often found that when all signs say you should bet one way, the other side wins. For example, when a team's star player is out and they pull the upset with their backs against the ropes. It happens more often that not. Or when a line looks way too good to be true, and the other side ends up winning.

[bsutphi]

I like this spot for the Lakers. Now if the Lakers win tonight and I turn around and bet the Lakers to win outright tomorrow in OKC, then you can call me a square, idiot whatever you want. On a side note, has anyone else noticed that clown with the leopard skin vest and pink clappers cheering on the Mavs?

[laddder]

with you on the Lakers, BOL

[freelife1]

Lakers facing a lot of adversity. They just had that "players only" meeting. The revenge factor from last year's Western Conference finals. I know they struggle on the road, but this game has upset written all over it. Agree?

you should change your account name to daPAINThuffa

[bsutphi]

you should change your account name to daPAINThuffa

Haters gon' hate. You must still be bitter about all the money you lost backing UCONN the other night against Nova.

[freelife1]

damn you saw that..

[bsutphi]

lol yep