Tracking my plays

BigDofBA · 05-20-12, 12:24 AM

Originally posted by paco

Guess my okc pick worked out

Betting on the better team when they are only -1 usually does.

OKC has now won 5 of 7 against LA and scored over 100 in five of those games.

Too much Durant. Too much Westbrook. Not enough respect for the Thunder.

texhooper · 05-20-12, 12:27 AM

no coin i'm not one to emulate in the wagering world, but take a page out of my book and just stop playing nba totals brother. i haven't kept up with all your plays but i bet if you took totals out you would see a pretty significant increase in winning percentage and most importantly, total units. if not, sorry i misspoke.

+20 units since you started over is pretty good though, dude.

No coincidences · 05-20-12, 12:31 AM

Originally posted by texhooper

no coin i'm not one to emulate in the wagering world, but take a page out of my book and just stop playing nba totals brother. i haven't kept up with all your plays but i bet if you took totals out you would see a pretty significant increase in winning percentage and most importantly, total units. if not, sorry i misspoke.

+20 units since you started over is pretty good though, dude.

Couldn't agree more. I always quit and then get sucked back in.

Thanks tex.

No coincidences · 05-20-12, 12:32 AM

Originally posted by paco

Guess my okc pick worked out

Nice. You were lucky to get that push last night, so I'd say a 1-0-1 24 hours from this series is pretty damn good.

paco · 05-20-12, 01:18 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Nice. You were lucky to get that push last night, so I'd say a 1-0-1 24 hours from this series is pretty damn good.

Hit okc 2nd half yesterday also posted in my thread so 2-0-1, yea.

Durant is cold blooded

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 05:48 PM

PHI +5.5 (3.3U to win 3)

If this covers, I'm done for the day. If not, I'll play the Lakers.

ebbearsfb1 · 05-21-12, 06:18 PM

Took the under looks like a massive mistake... should of just stuck with mlb

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 06:27 PM

Here we go again: Sixers live ML running 20 cents higher at rec. books vs. sharp ones. Interesting. C's might be in trouble.

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 06:50 PM

-108/-108 (Pinny) vs. +115/-145 (BOL) live now.

Wow.

BigDofBA · 05-21-12, 06:53 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

-108/-108 (Pinny) vs. +115/-145 (BOL) live now.

Wow.

That sucks for all the morons that bought a point and a half an took Boston at -4 (-138).....LOL.

ebbearsfb1 · 05-21-12, 06:55 PM

I took the under, I already turned it off..... glad they are shooting 60%... everything going in... 100 points in the first half on game that books had low 170s... unbelievable

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 08:11 PM

So much for the "sharp book" theory here.

t-wizzle · 05-21-12, 08:14 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

So much for the "sharp book" theory here.

Boston was always going to win this game. The ML movement indicated so from the minute it opened.

I was suspicious that books were trying to just collect juice on the sixers and it turned out to be the case.

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 08:16 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Boston was always going to win this game. The ML movement indicated so from the minute it opened.

I was suspicious that books were trying to just collect juice on the sixers and it turned out to be the case.

Who in the hell was on the Sixers? "Collecting juice" on whom?

Like I said, Pinny was offering the C's ML at -108 in the second quarter. Why?

t-wizzle · 05-21-12, 08:20 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Who in the hell was on the Sixers? "Collecting juice" on whom?

Like I said, Pinny was offering the C's ML at -108 in the second quarter. Why?

Lol you always take those public better percentages like they are the bible. There was plenty of sixers money. Sixers had the appearance of being the sharp side being that the line was only 5.5 and the early money on them. You act like no one bet on philadelphia.

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Lol you always take those public better percentages like they are the bible. There was plenty of sixers money. Sixers had the appearance of being the sharp side being that the line was only 5.5 and the early money on them. You act like no one bet on philadelphia.

What else would the line be? -7?

t-wizzle · 05-21-12, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

What else would the line be? -7?

-6.5

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 08:29 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

-6.5

Why would it be that?

No coincidences · 05-21-12, 08:44 PM

Lakers +7.5 (2.2U to win 2)

No coincidences · 05-22-12, 12:43 AM

0-2, -5.5U tonight
86-84, +14.75U thread

Man.

No coincidences · 05-24-12, 07:07 PM

Heat/Pacers under 182 (1.1U to win 1)
Heat TT under 92 (1.1U to win 1)

No coincidences · 05-24-12, 08:28 PM

Heat 2H under 47.5 (2.2U to win 2)

No coincidences · 05-24-12, 08:53 PM

Heat/Pacers live under 194.5 (1.1U to win 1)

No coincidences · 05-24-12, 09:40 PM

Haven't won a total bet in I don't know how long.

Funny thing is I almost played the under last night, but laid off. Of course that one cashed with ease.

0-4, -5.5U tonight
86-89, +9.25U thread

No coincidences · 05-26-12, 05:56 PM

Sixers +6 (2.2U to win 2)
Sixers +264 (.5U to win 1.32)

JamesBrown · 05-26-12, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Sixers +6 (2.2U to win 2)
Sixers +264 (.5U to win 1.32)

Im taking the 6 myself! Wanted to play the ML but chickened out. Large wager at +6 though. Cheers!

No coincidences · 05-26-12, 07:04 PM

Originally posted by JamesBrown

Im taking the 6 myself! Wanted to play the ML but chickened out. Large wager at +6 though. Cheers!

Let's get it JB.

Adding 3U to Philly +6.

Here we go.

No coincidences · 05-26-12, 07:04 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Sixers +6 (5.5U to win 5)
Sixers +264 (.5U to win 1.32)

Updated.

BigDofBA · 05-26-12, 07:10 PM

Good luck with Philly.

I'm taking Boston but going to wait live.

No coincidences · 05-26-12, 07:20 PM

Sixers +9 (live) (2.2U to win 2)

Might as well go down with the ship.

No coincidences · 05-26-12, 07:21 PM

Originally posted by BigDofBA

Good luck with Philly.

I'm taking Boston but going to wait live.

Thanks BigD. You might not get a chance.

BigDofBA · 05-26-12, 07:24 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Thanks BigD. You might not get a chance.

Well. Not the start I was hoping for.

No coincidences · 05-27-12, 06:24 PM

86-92, +1.05U thread

Spurs Game 1 -240 (9.6U to win 4)

If they lose, I'll double up on the ML in Game 2 and find myself staring into a monstrous hole.

Speedy88 · 05-27-12, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

86-92, +1.05U thread

Spurs Game 1 -240 (9.6U to win 4)

If they lose, I'll double up on the ML in Game 2 and find myself staring into a monstrous hole.

not sure if i've ever seen you lay -240 juice before NC...

BigDofBA · 05-27-12, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

86-92, +1.05U thread

Spurs Game 1 -240 (9.6U to win 4)

If they lose, I'll double up on the ML in Game 2 and find myself staring into a monstrous hole.

LOL. I'm doing the exact opposite.

I'm taking OKC ML game 1. If it loses I'm taking them again in game two. I'm getting 2 to 1 on my money so I just need to win one.