All things considered, shouldn't Portland be about +4 or 5 tonight?

[No coincidences]

I figured the line would open higher than it did. Blazers without Aldridge, on a B2B2B, against a team with a much better record. Does the Rose Garden really neutralize so much else that they'd only be +2? Teams split their first two matchups on each other's home court, but obviously Aldridge played both times.

Interesting. I might wait to get a better number then slam Portland.

[flyboy]

If portland plays as well as they did last night I think they win outright.

[DudleyDawson]

all the squares are unloading right now on the clipps cause as we know the squares can't wait to get their bets in. I may unload on port later. books don't give this shit away. also Celts +8, oh yea a great bet.

[No coincidences]

Really thought this line would climb at least a little.

The fact that it hasn't makes me like the Blazers even more. Aldridge or no Aldridge, you don't get Portland at home with a + anything very often.

[No coincidences]

If portland plays as well as they did last night I think they win outright.

They obviously miss Aldridge and will tonight trying to contain Griffin, but I still love junk yard dogs like Wallace and Crawford.

[monologue]

looks like they should but in reality its not. Therefore, clippers are square so pound on portland