Portland moved from +3 to +6

Elad · 02-15-12, 10:32 AM

Take this and dont look back...******* bookies...why i didnt bet yesterday..

TehSharp · 02-15-12, 10:33 AM

I got in at -2.5 as well. Destroy it!

TehSharp · 02-15-12, 10:34 AM

And where is this bookie at...I need to meet him....

migz · 02-15-12, 10:42 AM

Just added 4 more units to GSW-2.5!

PS3 · 02-15-12, 10:43 AM

Glad I got -3. I hope I'm on the right track.

migz · 02-15-12, 10:44 AM

Originally posted by PS3

Glad I got -3. I hope I'm on the right track.

Me too. Gl. Was surprised line didn't move after the game. Was it serious though?

PS3 · 02-15-12, 10:56 AM

Originally posted by migz

Me too. Gl. Was surprised line didn't move after the game. Was it serious though?

Bothers me too. Books reacted too late. But I don't want to overthink this. Aldridge is their main weapon.
Also they are poor during b2b situations. During road games they don't play the same intensity they bring out during home games.

I'll listen to Elad. I WILL NOT LOOK BACK.

Good luck Buddy!

Sport_Fish · 02-15-12, 12:13 PM

-5 at my book...don't think i can play GSW now. Hopefully Portland scores first few buckets so I can live bet GSW at a better line.

Pauulzcappin · 02-15-12, 12:16 PM

Probably because Lamarcus Aldridge has been confirmed out. He's worth 2 points on a Portland game for sure.

Sport_Fish · 02-15-12, 12:25 PM

Originally posted by Pauulzcappin

Probably because Lamarcus Aldridge has been confirmed out. He's worth 2 points on a Portland game for sure.

This could mean GSW wins by 5+ pts and easily takes care of Portland...since we already saw how much the Blazers struggle without Aldrige. Or it could be one of those Heat@Hawks type game where their star player is out and the rest of the team suddenly steps up and may win outright.

Tough to say, I would still go with the initial theory because I just don't think Portland can keep up with GSW's scoring without L.A