Lakers v. Bobcats: Pick the final score, get 2 pts if within 5 pts of game total

[cleaveland]

Post your prediction for the final score of the Lakers-Bobcats game and if you're within 5 points of the total points scored for the game you'll get 2 points from me. Only the first 43 winners will be paid at most.

[mjbroncos]

174

[cleaveland]

174

You have to predict the score and then if the total of your prediction is within 5 points of the actual total then you win.

[jackdean33]

98-83

Lakers way.

[betme]

92-78 lakers

[BrodyBalboa]

101-78 Lakers

[Bullet Kays]

86-77 Lakers

[jubjub]

Lakers 100-83

[GoBlue77]

Lakers 113 Kittens 86

[cleaveland]

No more picks. Everyone picked the Lakers to cover and a question occurred to me because of that:

Can a play be both square and sharp at the same time? I think so, we need a betting Einstein to figure this stuff out. Where's BW when you need him?

[yisman]

damn, missed a fairly easy contest here

[Lockitup1x]

...

[GoBlue77]

No more picks. Everyone picked the Lakers to cover and a question occurred to me because of that:

Can a play be both square and sharp at the same time? I think so, we need a betting Einstein to figure this stuff out. Where's BW when you need him?

short answer yes. the terms square and sharp are vastly overused on here.
taking the lakers at home would seem like a very square play but they are playing the worst team in the NBA, im sure the sharps were on the lakeshow tonight or didnt bother to hit this game at all.


< liking my score prediction so far

[BlurredOut]

96-81 lakers

[G3ko08]

97-78 Lakers

[cleaveland]

short answer yes. the terms square and sharp are vastly overused on here.
taking the lakers at home would seem like a very square play but they are playing the worst team in the NBA, im sure the sharps were on the lakeshow tonight or didnt bother to hit this game at all.


< liking my score prediction so far

Thanks for giving us your opinion! I'd like to hear your definitions of square and sharp if you wouldn't mind.

[Bullet Kays]

No more picks. Everyone picked the Lakers to cover and a question occurred to me because of that:

Can a play be both square and sharp at the same time? I think so, we need a betting Einstein to figure this stuff out. Where's BW when you need him?

I didn't pick lakers to cover.

[cleaveland]

101-78 Lakers

The system's not allowing me to give you points, I'll try again later.

[cleaveland]

Lakers 100-83

The system's not allowing me to give you points, I'll try again later.

[BrodyBalboa]

The system's not allowing me to give you points, I'll try again later.

No worries. Thats right on ha, the total anyway..

[cleaveland]

No worries. Thats right on ha, the total anyway..

Yeah, you should post your plays more often.