Decent $$$ off of -394/-394...

[ANGRYBLACK]

So i came up with this strategy that someone probably came up with 50 years ago... It should work out pretty good. There are no guarantees, but all you need is 2 safe bets. Lets say those bets are -394. Then you take any damn -110 bet you can find doesn't matter.

-394/-394/Bulls-Heat u181 = 100/200.12
-394/-394/Bulls-Heat o181 = 100/200.12
You win $200 ($100 profits) either way... Essentially you're investing $200 to win $100.12 in profits on a couple -394 locks...

Of course you can find safe bets that are better than -394, a couple -200 bets pay out $329.55 ($229.55 in profits) Has anyone heard of anything like this or used it before?

[Bradyd]

Yep and you will be surprise to see how often that "lock" or "safe bet" loses....

[terpkeg]

Adding the over and the under decreases your odds.

Just parlay the two -394's.

[ANGRYBLACK]

Adding the over and the under decreases your odds. Just parlay the two -394's.

Parlaying the -394/-394 leaves you with $157.20 ($57.20 profit). So yes, that way makes more per dollar invested. It's just that last night I had Djoker/Essendon Bombers/OKC over @200/398. I was going to add Djoker/Essendon Bombers/OKC under @200/398, but fell asleep. I should have. I'd be up 2 units instead of down 2 units. So I take it that my premeditated hedge doesn't work?

[forzuto13]

The problem is the "lock" that you think you have. Not only one but two, which decreases your chances to just hit those. I don't know about you, but I have lost on plenty of big favorites. Worst was a nine team parlay where I had Chicago Bulls at home ML and that was one of my "locks" (that I put in almost every other parlay that night) and that one didn't hit!

[JOHON8]

There's a ton of -200 ML lines in soccer that hit very often. I usually take -1 goals to bring it to +money, but if you want you can use your strategy with the ML's.

[blinky88]

Bulls in 6