Under 89????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DemoralizdDreamr
    SBR MVP
    • 02-04-11
    • 4319

    #1
    Under 89????
    They scored 93 i the first, which i thought was pretty decent. Cant see it happening again. Any thoughts??
  • No coincidences
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 01-18-10
    • 76300

    #2
    Why would it not be 87 (in line with original game number)?
    Comment
    • Vaioice
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 06-04-10
      • 780

      #3
      worried bout the trips to the stripe, reminds me of that first Miami/Boston game. looked way under and went KABOOM
      Comment
      • DemoralizdDreamr
        SBR MVP
        • 02-04-11
        • 4319

        #4
        Originally posted by No coincidences
        Why would it not be 87 (in line with original game number)?
        The game is higher pace than expected.
        Comment
        • No coincidences
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-18-10
          • 76300

          #5
          Originally posted by DemoralizdDreamr
          The game is higher pace than expected.
          1H only went over by what? A bucket?

          I could understand the higher 2H total if the 1H was sitting at like 98-100.
          Comment
          • DemoralizdDreamr
            SBR MVP
            • 02-04-11
            • 4319

            #6
            under it is than
            Comment
            Search
            Collapse
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...