Who Actually Took The Over in Celtics/Knicks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pride
    SBR MVP
    • 04-12-10
    • 4238

    #1
    Who Actually Took The Over in Celtics/Knicks?
    I am curious because I would love to hear the reasoning for it. The under was such an easy play.
  • celtics12
    SBR High Roller
    • 03-29-11
    • 227

    #2
    i did, because i am a retard basically..ive been grade A fade material basically as of late...honestly think there might have been a chance if they both didnt start off 0-25
    Comment
    • 70kgman
      SBR MVP
      • 01-31-10
      • 4354

      #3
      I didn't play either side. But over was the right play in this game. The pace is way faster than the total. If it ends up going under, it will just be a lucky win because NY are shooting 30%. I did grab over 181.5 on a live in game wager.
      Comment
      • ThaTopMoron
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 04-30-10
        • 27020

        #4
        I saw a lot of people saying OVER... a lot of people who know more than me and probably win a lot more than me, but I never liked the idea of OVER. Boston just doesn't seem intent on "destroying" their opponents like last yr or 08... just do enough to get the job done... somehow they have pulled that off now twice.

        I didn't bet over or under for the entire game, just under for the 1q. It hit, I expect a 1q OVER in NY though... Knicks @ home will come out and put up 25-30 and Bos will stay close.
        Comment
        SBR Contests
        Collapse
        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
        Collapse
        Working...