Over 186

[strictlywinners]

Take Over in Celtics game.

[rake922]

Why? That's not even the right line

[strictlywinners]

Why? That's not even the right line

Yea my fault typo OVER 176.

[LT Profits]

I LOVE the UNDER here. It shoulld be just like other two games in Boston, when teams scored 148 and 162 respectively.

[The_Kid]

These two teams still haven't proven they can consistently put the ball in the hoop. They are more defensive minded than offensive minded. There is no way I can take the OVER in this game.

[unde0087]

the kid is right here, why would you consider the over? If you look at the numbers nothing supports an over here. They have played the under in 3 of 4 in this series and that was because Cavs shot the ball the best I have ever seen them shoot it at home. You are asking the Cavs who haven't put up more than 73 points to go to Boston and score freely on that defense. Kid was spot on when he said these teams are defensive teams. I would be shocked to see this come close to the total. If you play this total you have to play the under, there just is no numbers that would suggest anything else. Like LT said, 148 and 162 as totals in Boston I just don't see how you would feel confident about an over looking at that info, not to mention the numerous and rediculous under streaks the Cavs and the Celtics have in conference semifinal games. But I guesss after watching the end of that Detroit game anything is possible.

If you are telling people to take the over, what data are you basing this on because I can't find any that support this?

[vassman86]

take the under 176 for celts game 5

my analysis suggests that the under is the way to go. tonight, expect the celtics to play really tight defence. They want to have a 3-2 series lead when they go back to cleveland for game 6. they know that they can't afford to lose this game to cleveland, or they can potentially be eliminated in game 6.

[strictlywinners]

Well I guess everyone that told me what a terrible pick this was was wrong. Thanks for the insight though.

[chipski]

nice pick , most people always tend to lean with what they have seen in the recent past , in games before . you bucked what you had witnessed in the previous games and got it . way to go .

i was thinking the celtics could reach the centruty mark in this particular game myself so that would mean the cavs only had to make it to 76 or 77 . celts made it to 96 which is why i played celts over team total in game 2 in bos at 93 and they only made it to 89 . the subs came in with 2:32 left i think and couldint do shi! clank clank clank clank clank clank clank clank

what do you think of tonights no at sa o/u 184 ?

[Wilforth]

nice pick , most people always tend to lean with what they have seen in the recent past , in games before . you bucked what you had witnessed in the previous games and got it . way to go .

i was thinking the celtics could reach the centruty mark in this particular game myself so that would mean the cavs only had to make it to 76 or 77 . celts made it to 96 which is why i played celts over team total in game 2 in bos at 93 and they only made it to 89 . the subs came in with 2:32 left i think and couldint do shi! clank clank clank clank clank clank clank clank

what do you think of tonights no at sa o/u 184 ?

It's hard to tell what might happen tonight given what we witnessed these past 2 days. One would however lean on the over as the Hornets might want to push for a win. I'm tempted to wait until the match begins. It might be better to predict the 2H u/o based on what happens in the 1H.