I think.
-
-
If u sprinkle a little on both ml's ur a guaranteeing urself a profitable night!Comment -
HOU @ SAS worries me more than the Indiana game (I have a parlay on both CHI and SAS) - HOU has screwed me so many times this year as an underdog and this game just fits one of those scenarios where HOU have no right to keep this game close but probably will until the final minutes. I think I'm going to hedge with a HOU 1Q bet, as invariably in these games I check scores in the 1Q and the dog has built an early 10 point lead - the old "here we go again" that us sports betters know so well
Comment -
not sure about ML's but like both plus the points!Comment -
Total plays:
MIN/TOR over 220
IND/CHI over 194
LAC/CHA under 192 (though that's a bad number -- wish I'd grabbed it at 195)Comment -
nets +240Comment -
I'vs been thinking about the Rockets/Spurs game for a few days. I like the Spurs to win it SU (possibly ATS), but expect a strong 1H from Houston before they fade.
I think at least one of the Pacers and Nets will win it SU.Comment -
HOU has been money in the 1st Q and 1/2... but they can NOT finish...Comment -
just saw a bid big move in the Northwestern total(141) right before tip ..over went from -119 to -144...pinny moved the line to 144 and juiced the under at -127......never saw a move that highLast edited by JR007; 01-29-11, 07:15 PM.Comment -
yea fridays/saturdays have been wild for some time now. Why not the Wizards on the ML that one seems the most far fetchedComment -
no coin..sk ..can you guys give me a opinion on the above total in the ohio state game...took the over ..wondering if that was the right play
Comment -
Only Pinnacle jumped their line up that far. No one else went above 142.5, so it appears to be an isolated incident. Maybe even a mistake from SBRodds (unless you watched it actually jump on Pinnacle's site?) I don't think I can even offer a suggestion as to what caused the jump. No idea...Comment -
If I had to pick I'd take the Pacers.Comment -
thanks SKComment -
And obviously no one would say anything bad about these predictions you made because both of these teams are SUPPOSE to lose.Comment -
Good night for the favorites. Right when I decide to pick a couple of underdogs.Comment -
The only underdog that is looking like an upset tonight are the Kings. Of course lots of people her hate the Kings so I doubt if anyone took them. I didn't take them because the +165 it was paying wasn't worth it for me. I did not put a dime on that game tonight.Comment -
Took Hornets live at +300ish.Comment -
Let me guess. Tomorrow you will say either the Pistons and maybe the Cavs shock the world
Comment -
All your picks are so predictable that's what.Comment -
I just find it annoying that all your posts are the same every single day. You will claim so and so team will win SU. Sure you get some right because you are bound to get some of them right. BUt when you are wrong, no one says anything because you are suppose to lose with those teams SU.Comment -
Could you exaggerate more? You are only weakening your argument every time you throw a blanket generalization over my plays.
Yes, I take a swing on a big dog sometimes. Yes, I like to play teams + the points if the opportunity presents itself. But to say that's all I post? Come on.
For someone so obsessed with my threads, you obviously don't pay very close attention to them.Comment -
All you are playing all those underdogs or line moves. Nothing else. Is that good enough?Comment -
Green Bay -3.5 and Pittsburgh -4 were line moves. Are you aware of this?Comment -
What if the line was Pitt -2 and Bears -1? Then you would take the Jets and Bears probably.
Yea you played them because they were the better team... Then why does almost 75% of your picks in the nba is always the underdog then?Comment -
All you are doing is fading the public and playing reverse line movement, nothing more.Comment
