Mon 1/24 NBA totals off by +20 pts

[asian.executive]

1-0 last night.

The formula system results show these games as being off by +20 pts.

Bulls game & Rockets game.

Two picks tonight:
Chicago Under
Houston Over

[firehoyt]

So where did you copy/paste this from?! In all your other threads your English/Grammer is atrocious. So obviously this isn't your own work...

[oiler]

maybe he has hooked on phonics lol

[asian.executive]

No NCAAB False Favorites tonight.

0-4 last night.

I could apply the false favorite program to NBA. Let me crunch the numers.

Notice I use spellchecker.

[asian.executive]

I agree with people bettors here because my spelling was cruel and awful. I using spellchecker before I posted for now on.

[Pap45murF]

Bulls/Bucks total is NOT off by 20 points. So you're telling me that the correct total would be 158...

I realize it it will be a low scoring game, but 80-78 is a bit of a stretch, eh?

[GoggsViggs]

Keep up the good work bro

[asian.executive]

No, I am saying the opposite. The formula system says the final score is 207 in the Bulls game. So the question becomes why is the total so low? Last night the Denver game system said the final score was in the 180's. That is why the Denver Over was the pick last night.

I have not emailed the system to anyperson yet so that is why the reason for confusions. The calculation formulas are very square in nature and basic alegebra III formula was used. Square person calculates 180s in the Denver game and takes under. We inverse that thinking and take Over.

[Pap45murF]

So because the total is lower than it should be... you take the even lower in a "vegas must know something" approach.

Seems like if the score is calculated higher than the posted total... one would bet the Over, "square" or not.

[No coincidences]

I don't know about 20 points off, but I agree with both of these plays.

[No coincidences]

No, I am saying the opposite. The formula system says the final score is 207 in the Bulls game. So the question becomes why is the total so low? Last night the Denver game system said the final score was in the 180's. That is why the Denver Over was the pick last night.

I have not emailed the system to anyperson yet so that is why the reason for confusions. The calculation formulas are very square in nature and basic alegebra III formula was used. Square person calculates 180s in the Denver game and takes under. We inverse that thinking and take Over.

You do realize these two teams scored 252 points the first time they met earlier this season, right?

In the 180's?

[asian.executive]

The formula was created and when we backtested we realized immediately that the inverse was occuring. We realized that our basic formula was basic square logic that Las Vegas already knew about.

[asian.executive]

Yes as funny as sounds when you consider points for & against averages and crunk through the basic alegebra formula the system calculated 188 for the Denver game.

[alukk]

So because the total is lower than it should be... you take the even lower in a "vegas must know something" approach. Seems like if the score is calculated higher than the posted total... one would bet the Over, "square" or not.

Why do you care so much, you can play the opposite, hes playing his own system even if its a vegas must know or fade the public, etc.

[alukk]

Btw Good luck asian

[asian.executive]

My math friend is not a gambler. It makes sense he create formulas where the results wer opposite of what we thought would happen. Is that not why Las Vegas is successful?

[kmarinouofm]

what is funny is that i capped both these games.. the under in chicago and the over in houston..

[3-ball]

congrats mate!

[FJ_islander]

You were on the dot with your plays Asian. Keep up the good work.

[asian.executive]

no tues totals are off by 20 pts