Late Money

[ridims]

There is no way he got the pacers at +4 1st half anywhere at the time he posted that. Its at +3 everywhere i've checked. I don't know what the line opened up at though so maybe he got it earlier this morning?? For it to drop a point is interesting.

Anyhow. GL

[vinny808]

I think we must start an edit watch on this guy.

[Ratzz]

where did u get pacers +4...no book is offering that...stop posting fake lines.

you are absolutely correct.. (about mistakes, not fake lines, lol)
i just checked in my notebook..
i wrote down the lines of the two 1H plays i was making..

in my notes: IND +3 and LAC +4 (which has since gone up to 4.5)

i mixed them up when i typed then in wrong and transposed them..

i am correcting the error.. but it really doesn't matter..
i seriously expect the PACERS will be winning outright at the Half.. ahead by at least 3

PROOF: notice that the LA CLIPPERS i have listed at +3, when everywhere it was +4, and now +4.5
if i was really screwing with lines, why would i deduct an extra point from my Clipper pick, on the road??!

i would never do that.
error 1) i merely typed in the CLIPPER line for IND pick,
error 2) and i typed in the Pacer Line for LAC pick..

clerical error, not unethical line manipulation,
i think I am a better capper than that...

[Ratzz]

REPOST w/LINES corrections..
***see above for exp.***

WED • JAN-26 • 2011

1st Halves •

Indiana Pacers.....(+3) 1st Half vs. ORL (I had LAC line here +4)
LA Clippers.....(+4.5) 1st Half vs. HOU (and I had IND line here +3) went up +0.5


1st Quarters •

DEN/DET.....OVER (52) 1st Qtr
ATL/MIL.....OVER (46.5) 1st Qtr


DATA ••

ORL shot poorly vs. DET.
IND shot well in DEN.

LAC Revenge game. home loss 97-92
HOU bad defense last home game.

DEN no win in DET since (1995), hoping to get ahead and stay.
DET b2b wins Confidence up.

ATL Horford/Williams back.
MIL dropped in only 80 last time vs. Atl at home.


GL2ALL

[Ratzz]

There is no way he got the pacers at +4 1st half anywhere at the time he posted that. Its at +3 everywhere i've checked. I don't know what the line opened up at though so maybe he got it earlier this morning?? For it to drop a point is interesting.

Anyhow. GL

R..

if you are so thorough with the lines..and detected the first error.. (1 pt. more than list)
why did you not catch the mistake on the second one also? (1 pt. less than list)

and then put two and two together.. and deduce the error?

GL as well

[F.Lucena]

Good luck tonigh!!
Let's cash some money!!

[Ratzz]

WED • JAN-26 • 2011

1st Halves •

Indiana Pacers.....(+3.5) 1st Half vs. ORL
LA Clippers.....(+4.5) 1st Half vs. HOU


1st Quarters •

DEN/DET.....OVER (52) 1st Qtr
ATL/MIL.....OVER (46.5) 1st Qtr

GL2ALL

WED • JAN-26 • 2011 (adding)

1st Halves •

ATL Hawks.....(-1) 1st Half

bad as possible start... came out ahead... decent..

[knicks11487]

I can't wait for the knicks game on thursday. the knicks are the best. they are going to win it all this year. give gallo the ball. pick Knicks!!!!!!!!

[Ratzz]

WED • JAN-26 • 2011 (adding)

1st Halves •

ATL Hawks.....(-1) 1st Half

[ProPicker713]

Den game might hit for 1q bro dont give it .

[ProPicker713]

thank melo bow down to him 1q over 52 .

[ProPicker713]

$$$$$$$$$

[Ratzz]

THREAD RECORD ••

the total for this thread record
NBA is 45-30-2 (.600)

NBA 25-10 (.714) since Jan. 18th..

[Ratzz]

Den game might hit for 1q bro dont give it .

thank you pro... i was giving up too early.. thought it was a bust!

worked out good... and you wuz right.. good call

[Ratzz]

THU • JAN-27 • 2011

1st HALVES •

MIA Heat.....(-2) 1st Half • 89% public
HOU Rockets.....(+3.5) 1st Half• 20% public
POR Trailblazers.....(+2.5) 1st Half • 9% public

If you agree, best to place the first immediately, and to wait on the last two.

NBA is 45-30-2 (.600) entire thread
NBA 25-10 (.714) since Jan. 18th..

BoL2ALL

[Dexter]

do you flat bet?

[Ratzz]

do you flat bet?

no.. but i believe that to be successful, one has to focus on record.. rather than winnings.
(even though winnings is the bottom line, the bottom line is mostly created by winning frequency)

the foundation (imo) must be the record. This makes betting large amounts an easy decision.
i also don't like to recommend to people how much to bet...
my record is positive, so if i know there is no danger of directing someone down the wrong path.

if a capper recommends a monster bet, and it loses..
he will feel the impulse to make it up quickly.. recommend larger bets...
which can initiate some very problematic compulsive behavior in some

i do make larger bets.. but it is something that i do independently. without posting it

[JR007]

wrong..it is not about record..it is about return of investment (ROI)

you use the edit feature a lot...any reason for that

[Bic]

Fade this pretender.

[vinny808]

THU • JAN-27 • 2011

1st HALVES •

MIA Heat.....(-2) 1st Half • 89% public
HOU Rockets.....(+3.5) 1st Half• 20% public
POR Trailblazers.....(+2.5) 1st Half • 9% public

If you agree, best to place the first immediately, and to wait on the last two.

0-2-1 = .000 for tonight.

BoL2ALL

Hey Ratz, you're usually quick to post the results. Since you were a no-show tonight, I thought I'd do it for you as a convenience. Thank me later.

[Ratzz]

THU • JAN-27 • 2011

1st HALVES •

MIA Heat.....(-2) 1st Half • 89% public **PUSH**
HOU Rockets.....(+3.5) 1st Half• 20% public
POR Trailblazers.....(+2.5) 1st Half • 9% public

If you agree, best to place the first immediately, and to wait on the last two.

NBA is 45-30-2 (.600) entire thread
NBA 25-10 (.714) since Jan. 18th..

BoL2ALL

haha indeed... i certainly deserve that.. no probz..
and shoulda posted it immediately..
i was in the laboratory, trying to figure out why i was so wrong on the HOU pick.
I believe i understand why, and will avoid that error when it presents itself again.

the first however was a PUSH, i never post a person's push with a neg symbol..
visually misleading.. people glance, rarely read when symbols are present.
but you are right, for evening a big fat (.000)

adjustments made (hopefully) we'll see tonite

[Ratzz]

FRI • JAN-28 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT–
this will be either very good or very bad... likely no 50-50%
if good i will post the rest

1st HALVES • 7PM

MEM GRIZZLIES.....(+2) 1st Half
TOR RAPTORS.....(+1.5) 1st Half
IND PACERS.....(-3) 1st Half


just testing an observation about Line Movement

BoL2ALL

[Ratzz]

FRI • JAN-28 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT– (addendum)

1st QUARTERS • 8PM

CHI BULLS.....(PK).....1st Qtr.
WAS/OKL.....UNDER (53.5).....1st Qtr.

hmm.. looks like 2 of 3 coming in.. (previous post)
let's make this adjustment, and apply it to 1st Qtrs.

BoL2ALL

[Ratzz]

FRI • JAN-28 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT– 4-1 so far... looking pretty good... let's keep going

1st QUARTERS • 9PM

MIN TIMBERWOLVES.....(+2).....1st Qtr.

BoL2ALL

[Ratzz]

FRI • JAN-28 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT– Final adjustment for this evening
i will try this out for entire games..

LATE GAMES • 10.30PM

SACRAMENTO.....(+12) Game..
PHOENIX.....(+4.5) Game..
GOLDEN STATE.....(-4) Game..

BoL2ALL

[gamble]

i'm on phoenix with you, good luck

[Ratzz]

FRI • JAN-28 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT–
this will be either very good or very bad... likely no 50-50%
if good i will post the rest

1st HALVES • 7PM

MEM GRIZZLIES.....(+2) 1st Half.....<X>
TOR RAPTORS.....(+1.5) 1st Half ....•$
IND PACERS.....(-3) 1st Half ..... •$$

1st QUARTERS • 8PM
CHI BULLS.....(PK).....1st Qtr......•$$$
WAS/OKL.....UNDER (53.5).....1st Qtr. ...•$$$$

1st QUARTERS • 9PM
MIN TIMBERWOLVES.....(+2).....1st Qtr. ... <XX>

LATE GAMES • 10.30PM
SACRAMENTO.....(+12) Game......•$$$$$
PHOENIX.....(+4.5) Game...... •$$$$$$
GOLDEN STATE.....(-4) Game..??

just testing an observation about Line Movement

BoL2ALL

either 6-3 or 7-2...
this method of Line observation appears to work pretty well, just one day though.. we won't know until a second or third day..

[Ratzz]

THREAD RECORD ••

the total for this thread record
NBA is 51-35-2 (.593)

NBA 31-15 (.673) since Jan. 18th..

[Ratzz]

SAT • JAN-29 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT– Line Watching works.
i must confess, at first i thought that Line Watching was an exaggerated claim.

Saturday 5ive-Spot

CHICAGO_(-8)
BULLS on 4 game win streak... stay HOT and manage to cover a somewhat fat line.

WASHINGTON_(+9.5)
Wizards ALMOST stuck it to Thunder in OKC. Stay HOT on road, and cover here

MINNESOTA_(-5)
RAPTORS lose another heartbreaker last night in OT. 10-game L-streak continues..

NEW JERSEY_(+6.5)
NETS are better than the 2nd Half of last game. Look for the team that stayed with the MAvs a week ago.

HOUSTON_(+8.5)
Rockets playing good road ball... stay with them for one more..

BoL2ALL

[Poundabooty]

So are you watching what it opens at and then betting on big movers..... New to this line moving concept

[Ratzz]

SAT • JAN-29 • 2011

NEW CAP STRAT– Line Watching works.
i must confess, at first i thought that Line Watching was an exaggerated claim.

Saturday 5ive-Spot

CHICAGO_(-8)$
BULLS on 4 game win streak... stay HOT and manage to cover a somewhat fat line.

WASHINGTON_(+9.5) X
Wizards ALMOST stuck it to Thunder in OKC. Stay HOT on road, and cover here

MINNESOTA_(-5) $$
RAPTORS lose another heartbreaker last night in OT. 10-game L-streak continues..

NEW JERSEY_(+6.5) XX
NETS are better than the 2nd Half of last game. Look for the team that stayed with the MAvs a week ago.

HOUSTON_(+8.5) XXX
Rockets playing good road ball... stay with them for one more..

BoL2ALL

(.400) bad evening,,, learned something though.. all was not lost

[Ratzz]

SUN • JAN-30 • 2011

BOSTON_(+2.5)

DENVER_(+2)

BoL2ALL

[Poundabooty]

Ratz why do you post. Are you trying to help others by posting winners that we can tail or are you doing it for you own personal benefit to show the world you are a good capper? Either way, once you make your picks, please don't go back and edit your post with changes. Anyone can pick winners that way

[Ratzz]

Ratz why do you post. Are you trying to help others by posting winners that we can tail or are you doing it for you own personal benefit to show the world you are a good capper? Either way, once you make your picks, please don't go back and edit your post with changes. Anyone can pick winners that way

if i do that, i do so before games in question begin...
today, i did not cap HEAT/OKC.. Miami is too weird a team.. i usually avoid them.
unbelievably great, or average.. who knows who's showing up..

my edit was eliminating PHX and GSW..
the more i looked at them, i questioned them

[Poundabooty]

I'm just saying maybe you should finish looking at them before you post?