Seems like over-inflated total

**thebestthereis** · 11-10-10, 02:50 PM

public high scoring teams always have high totals, probaly too high by a few points but thats how it goes

**CougarSports** · 11-10-10, 03:00 PM

Originally posted by bucsfan

Is it me or does the total on the Knick/Warrior sitting at 218 seem a bit high ?

Are you thinking under?

**bucsfan** · 11-10-10, 04:26 PM

Yeah Cougar I gonna jump all over the under here.

**Jive** · 11-10-10, 04:30 PM

I think this has a chance to go way under. Also playing Knicks under team total and maybe even Warriors under total.

**NEOHsports4life** · 11-10-10, 04:34 PM

wow 220 now @ bet us... under is the play

**Ski powder** · 11-10-10, 04:35 PM

Going with the under one unit 219 1/2 at betonlne..Good post Bucsfan

**bucsfan** · 11-10-10, 04:40 PM

OMG My man has it at 220

**CougarSports** · 11-10-10, 04:41 PM

Originally posted by bucsfan

Yeah Cougar I gonna jump all over the under here.

Under it is. GL all!

**castle** · 11-10-10, 05:12 PM

Absolutely agree. Pounded Under 220 for 7U.

**nulldah** · 11-10-10, 05:22 PM

but it's still warriors and knicks, when their 3s hit, there is no total that high enough to cover it

**kobebryant55** · 11-10-10, 05:26 PM

on the under also GOL..

**iQon** · 11-10-10, 05:27 PM

People are still betting on what teams did last year. Haven't followed NY, but GS has played some defense this year. I'd lay off this under though. A lot of grudges betwen the players and their old teams.