Well, after Don Nelson left, it was very obvious that they would not play as fast as when Don Nelson was their coach.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#7
Originally posted by Maximo
Well, after Don Nelson left, it was very obvious that they would not play as fast as when Don Nelson was their coach.
Good point. They've only scored 132, 109 and 115 points in their first three home games.
Comment
nj6
SBR Wise Guy
05-09-10
669
#8
I'm on the under, cool. I remember last year when these two met same shit happened.
Comment
Maximo
SBR Sharp
01-29-09
278
#9
Originally posted by No coincidences
Good point. They've only scored 132, 109 and 115 points in their first three home games.
Well, it is only 3 games. We can't have an obvious idea based on only 3 games.
In a long term, you will see how they will play slow and we can probably see more unders on their games.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#10
Originally posted by Maximo
Well, it is only 3 games. We can't have an obvious idea based on only 3 games.
In a long term, you will see how they will play slow and we can probably see more unders on their games.
They've shot 70 times in 2.5 quarters.
Comment
texhooper
SBR Posting Legend
01-05-09
10001
#11
i took the second half over 110. i've never ever ever seen a game that will be so obviously under in oakland man. even if you want to take the "new-look warriors stance", it's not like the jazz don't typically push the tempo either. the game is just a snooze fest. these idiots should be ashamed of themselves.
Comment
texhooper
SBR Posting Legend
01-05-09
10001
#12
COME ON, 73 POINT 4TH FOR THE PUSH!! OR EVEN OT BABY!! NEVER OUT OF IT!!