SAN ANTONIO STARS (+8) in Seattle

Masu485 · 06-20-10, 06:29 PM

fukk i wanted to take this but ended up taking seattle -8.5. no research at all, i just think friggin away teams need to stop covering at some pt.

texhooper · 06-20-10, 07:09 PM

i was looking at this too. san an took a freaking vagina pounding (i can't say a "penis slapping") at home to seattle a few weeks ago. and i mean a real damn vagina bludgeoning, never had a chance. something tells me they at least sneak in for the cover in seattle, but i haven't pulled the trigger yet. looked a lot better at 9.5 but now it's back to 8.5.

the major factor in my indecision is i don't know that i have the balls to bet against the storm. they're going to be our new wnba champions come september.

Jedi · 06-20-10, 07:47 PM

you don't need 'balls' in the WNBA, dood... in fact.. i think they're banned

go for it

JumpoffJoeBeezy · 06-20-10, 07:50 PM

Seems like a trap, no? They covered in three straight, coming off a win @ Phoenix and now they're asking them to not lose by double digits?

I like Seattle.

Handjuice · 06-20-10, 08:02 PM

Originally posted by Jedi

you don't need 'balls' in the WNBA, dood... in fact.. i think they're banned

go for it

Masu485 · 06-20-10, 08:19 PM

this is a pathetic 1st q

Masu485 · 06-20-10, 09:59 PM

nice, it's about time a home team covers.

texhooper · 06-20-10, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by Jedi

you don't need 'balls' in the WNBA, dood... in fact.. i think they're banned

go for it

well, apparently not, i saved myself a little coin. the end result is what i was fearing would happen, but i don't typically bet a team to blow out a team twice in a row home and away like that.