I really like 1H under 93 and 2H over whatever

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • No coincidences
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 01-18-10
    • 76300

    #1
    I really like 1H under 93 and 2H over whatever
    Thoughts?
  • Snowball
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 11-15-09
    • 30047

    #2
    one thing to consider about going under is that 93 is pretty low for an NBA 1h total
    and the absence of Kendrick Perkins means there will be a lot of space freed up on the floor.
    Perk is a big clogger. Also the celtic offense may be faster on breaks tonight.
    Doc has said he's going to show something totally new concerning rotations.
    Comment
    • IdHitThat
      SBR Hustler
      • 05-17-10
      • 91

      #3
      I like the under for the game
      Comment
      • No coincidences
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 01-18-10
        • 76300

        #4
        Originally posted by Snowball
        one thing to consider about going under is that 93 is pretty low for an NBA 1h total
        and the absence of Kendrick Perkins means there will be a lot of space freed up on the floor.
        Perk is a big clogger. Also the celtic offense may be faster on breaks tonight.
        Doc has said he's going to show something totally new concerning rotations.
        I was leaning over for the game -- might just play that. I do think we'll see more running from Boston tonight, and you know there will be a lot of 4Q points (unless it's a one-possession game until the very end).
        Comment
        • Goat Milk
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 03-24-10
          • 25850

          #5
          Originally posted by Snowball
          Doc has said he's going to show something totally new concerning rotations.
          He's gonna use Tony Allen a lot more with Pierce and Allen and try having Tony/Ray run the point.
          Cause Sleep is the Cousin of Death
          Comment
          SBR Contests
          Collapse
          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
          Collapse
          Working...