lakers +2 why not?

**LT Profits** · 05-23-10, 01:37 PM

Never makes sense to take +2 when ML is available.

That said, I am passing tonight.

**ProfaneReality** · 05-23-10, 01:40 PM

because you could have had +3, thats why not

**LT Profits** · 05-23-10, 01:53 PM

Originally posted by ProfaneReality

because you could have had +3, thats why not

Well, my point was ML is better than +2.

**hoopster42** · 05-23-10, 01:54 PM

regardless of your bet size, it's a bad number (you coulda gotten plus three or better) and the wrong side. other than that it looks great

**jjgold** · 05-23-10, 02:35 PM

Pound Suns

action points also

**acarmelo1** · 05-23-10, 02:49 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

Pound Suns

action points also

Like orlando yesterday?

**actionaddict86** · 05-23-10, 02:58 PM

big on lakers ml for me.

**hoopster42** · 05-23-10, 10:38 PM

Originally posted by hoopster42

regardless of your bet size, it's a bad number (you coulda gotten plus three or better) and the wrong side. other than that it looks great

**stealthyburrito** · 05-23-10, 11:13 PM

acarmelos BR is crushed now