Lots of people on the Bulls huh?

**Cougar Bait** · 04-02-10, 05:42 PM

I like the under better, but Bulls -5 in a parlay

**DaAce** · 04-02-10, 05:44 PM

you mean to tell me that the Bulls wont get their 15th road win in their 38th road game

**HCBoone** · 04-02-10, 05:44 PM

Wiz is still a joke, not a team you like putting money on. Unpredictable and generally awful. I don't like Bulls too much, but I would stake my money on them.

**2daBank** · 04-02-10, 05:48 PM

they "have to win" is a terrible fukkin theory if they wernt total shit they wouldnt be in such a spot, seems like time and again in every sport this "have to win" theory fuks ppl as the team that has to win rarely shows up

**sportfan** · 04-02-10, 05:48 PM

u play total on this game Paco? sitting @ 191

**paco** · 04-02-10, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by 2daBank

they "have to win" is a terrible fukkin theory if they wernt total shit they wouldnt be in such a spot, seems like time and again in every sport this "have to win" theory fuks ppl as the team that has to win rarely shows up

**sweetjones55** · 04-02-10, 05:52 PM

Teams that HAVE to win play nervous. Washington has a bunch of unproven players that are finally given a chance to start and want to put forth their best effort regardless of their record/situation right now. They will also play much looser because they have nothing to lose, they are not SUPPOSED to win.

Plus, Washington is a +5.5 homedog and it's friday night? Need I say more.

**HoulihansTX** · 04-02-10, 09:05 PM

Paco. Lets make a pact together.

We, SBR posters, will refrain from betting Shit teams that continue to find ways to lose.

Wizards 12 pt in the 4th qtr, is a way to lose.

Next time Paco. Wizzanators know how to bury a Sharp bettors bankroll

I played the Bulls -4, but @5.5 would have played Wizzanators, with a gun to my head.

**tealish** · 04-02-10, 09:08 PM

^teah wiz really played like they didnt give 2 shits in the 4th q

**paco** · 04-02-10, 09:10 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

Paco. Lets make a pact together.

We, SBR posters, will refrain from betting Shit teams that continue to find ways to lose.

Wizards 12 pt in the 4th qtr, is a way to lose.

Next time Paco. Wizzanators know how to bury a Sharp bettors bankroll

I played the Bulls -4, but @5.5 would have played Wizzanators, with a gun to my head.

**nosniboR11** · 04-02-10, 10:15 PM

lololololololol

**pat venditto** · 04-02-10, 10:17 PM

Paco apparently you've never watched the wizards play. They are terrible.

**paco** · 04-02-10, 10:51 PM

Wizards choked in the 4th. Only 12 points

**alukk** · 04-02-10, 11:07 PM

well the theory worked today whit the bobcats, bulls and spurs and also for the grizzlies that still have a chance

**HoulihansTX** · 04-02-10, 11:12 PM

Originally posted by alukk

well the theory worked today whit the bobcats, bulls and spurs and also for the grizzlies that still have a chance

Bobcats didnt cover. they won by one in OT.

But I dont know what your theory is?

**alukk** · 04-02-10, 11:14 PM

Originally posted by paco

With the "They have to win" theory? Thas a bad theory IMO . Wiz +5.5 @ home looks solid Bulls -5.5 on the road?

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

Bobcats didnt cover. they won by one in OT. But I dont know what your theory is?

Yea i know they didnt cover but i guess that they have to win is the theory

**HoulihansTX** · 04-02-10, 11:18 PM

Cool

**lakerboy** · 04-02-10, 11:20 PM

paco its all good - i didnt play this game but wiz was the proper call. the bulls are not 5.5 point faves on the road and the way the books juiced wash at the end suggested they were wary of sharp money on wash. most guys here are squares so just leave it and move on.

**paco** · 04-02-10, 11:31 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

paco its all good - i didnt play this game but wiz was the proper call. the bulls are not 5.5 point faves on the road and the way the books juiced wash at the end suggested they were wary of sharp money on wash. most guys here are squares so just leave it and move on.