Celtics vs Lakers o/u 189.5... isn't the Low??

[Grecdogg]

Sounds low to me?!

[Pride>UFC]

Sounds low to me?!

Boston= offensively challenged...actually, i'm done being politically correct, their offense is retarded.

Lakers without Kobe= easy win
Lakers with Kobe= 50/50

[Dexter]

this is exactly what some of my friends have said to me......its this low for a reason..

[No coincidences]

this is exactly what some of my friends have said to me......its this low for a reason..

I kind of treat the low numbers that jump out at you like the high numbers that jump out at you -- if they seem blatantly favored for the under, take the under. If they seem blatantly favored for the over, take the over. Because your average Joe's going to see them and do the opposite (overs on the really lows and unders on the really highs).

With that being said, I don't like this particular total. Was hoping for a 194-196 number.

[Wilforth]

At this number, it's either UNDER or pass. The linemakers know what they're doing.

[peeiempee]

No taking any action on this game, but if I had to choose I would go with the over. That's about 23.5 pts a quarter. Factor in OT, an early bonus and a tight game in the 4th, I'll take my chances on the over

[mr. leisure]

I`take a small flyer on the over

[lunchbawks]

sounds low for a game like this?

[2daBank]

i love me some TNT unders, and this is no exception

[lakerboy]

under under under

[rkelly110]

over by 3.2 ( buy 3 just in case )

[Grecdogg]

i love me some TNT unders, and this is no exception

2da, I respect your pics, you think this is gonna be an under game... I was going to go with the over... not any more.