BOS shot 100% for the first six minutes of the game, going up 22-16. That evened out in 2Q.
Comment
AC1318
SBR Hall of Famer
10-09-06
6712
#3
I saw they had a nice lead but
it quickly changed and probably for the game.
Comment
onlooker
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
36572
#4
Yeah, one went for me and the other went against. Go figure.
Just need the Celtics to out score the Hornets by 13 in the 2nd half to bring in my +5.
Comment
LargeMouthBass
Restricted User
03-18-07
1095
#5
Why did the starting line move so much for Sac vs ATL? I think the line started at PK or Sac -1 and closed at Sac -3 to -3.5. I liked ATL originally but smelled kinda fishy.
Comment
AC1318
SBR Hall of Famer
10-09-06
6712
#6
to trick squares into betting sacramento
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#7
Originally posted by onlòóker
Yeah, one went for me and the other went against. Go figure.
Just need the Celtics to out score the Hornets by 13 in the 2nd half to bring in my +5.
Green is just coming off their 'Super bowl'. They're in a Hawaii frame of mind.
Comment
The HG
SBR MVP
11-01-06
3566
#8
Probably the line moved as it did because people thought Sac had turned it around with their last win, and people still think of Atl as 100% scrubs. It is a situation you see around, where a good team goes through a rough patch and winds up as a small road fave vs a bottom-tier team, which is often a good bet. The difference here of course is Sac is not a good team and Atl is not currently a bottom-tier team, but they both still vaguely carry those reputations.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#9
With the three Texas teams being so strong, I wonder if there's a post-Texas angle for teams that just played two of these teams on the road. How does a team perform in the next game, depending on performance in those two games? May look into that.
Comment
tevari
SBR MVP
02-02-07
4959
#10
cashed the over on this game...boston's offensive prowess (or lack thereof) scared me in the 2nd.