I wonder what's the correlation for Quarter/HT/FT Bets

[Gaze73]

Let's say you make 1000 bets and hit 55% ATS. Would you hit roughly 55% for Q1 and HT with those same teams?
I see a lot of dogs do well early and then they blow the entire spread in Q4 or even OT.

[Gaze73]

Let's see. All dogs below.
Hornets won Q1 by 9, lost HT by 4, lost by 7 in OT.
Wizards won Q1 by 3, lost HT by 2, FT by 20.
Pelicans won Q1 by 6, won HT by 6, lost FT 3.
Jazz won Q1 by 1, won HT by 2, lost FT by 11.
GSW won Q1 by 1, lost HT by 8, lost FT by 18.
Portland lost Q1 by 2, lost by 22
Dallas won Q1 by 14, won HT by 4, lost by 10.

In summary:
6-1 won Q1, 7-0 covered Q1.
3-4 won HT; 4-3 covered HT.
0-7 won FT, 1-6 covered FT.

What are the odds that from 7 dogs that cover Q1 only 1 covers FT? I wonder if stuff like this evens out in the long run.

[coolguy73739]

YOU have nothing better to think on a NEW YEAR'S EVE? Have a life Mate..