Jay Edgar NBA, Friday 12.08.06

[Jay Edgar]

EDGAR LINE vs THE FINAL NUMBER (5% or more ML differential)
ML PLAYS (at 1* each)
Thursday, 2-1, +3.45u
(NJ, DET, MIA)
YTD 72-116, +28.15u

SAME TEAMS ATS (at 1* each)
Thursday, 2-1, +0.95u
YTD 105-83 (.559), +17.85u

TEAMS RANKED BY LAST-10-GAME POWER RATING
1 SAN, 2 HOU, 3 PHX, 4 DAL, 5 CHI
6 DEN, 7 MIN, 8 LAX, 9 LAC, 10 ORL

11 IND, 12 TOR, 13 WAS, 14 DET, 15 MIA
16 UTH, 17 MEM, 18 SEA, 19 CLE, 29 MIL

21 SAC, 22 NY, 23 ATL, 24 NOK, 25 CHA
26 GS, 27 POR, 28 BOS, 29 NJ, 30 PHI

EDGAR LINES FOR 12.08.06
HOU 0.3/102 over CHA
ORL 5.5/192 over DET
IND 5.9/210 over POR
BOS 0.2/102 over PHX
SAN 6.0/213 over LAC
MIN 4.5/168 over UTH
WAS 1.2/106 over PHA
CHI 4.7/171 over TOR
MIL 3.8/156 over MEM
SEA 3.7/152 over NOK
LAX 6.1/220 over ATL
DEN 6.9/261 over MIA

STRIKE PRICES FOR 5%-OFF METHOD
(Under 5%-OFF method, ML at this price or better calls for a play on that team both SU and ATS)
HOU +115, CHA +120
DET +231, ORL -159
POR +256, IND -173
PHX +120, BOS +115
LAC +262, SAN -176
UTH +199, MIN -141
WAS +110, PHI +124
TOR +200, CHI -144
MEM +183, MIL -132
NOK +182, SEA -128
LAX -181, ATL +270
MIA +325, DEN -216

[Razz]

Orlando, right?

[Jay Edgar]

Orlando, right?

[bigboydan]

Orlando

[Jay Edgar]

Info in top post now complete for Friday.

12 games



GL

[lkravovicz]

jay, is there a post that describes how to read your tables to a newbie?

[Jay Edgar]

jay, is there a post that describes how to read your tables to a newbie?

Here you go -- thanks for the interest.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/showthread.php?t=21621&referrerid=905

[lkravovicz]

"LAC 6.1/2.2 over ATL"

should read

LAL, right?

[moses millsap]

This card looks good JE

[Jay Edgar]

"LAC 6.1/2.2 over ATL"

should read

LAL, right?

Yes, thanks for the catch.

And from me you'll see "LAX" for the Lakers rather than "LAL" -- my handwritten LAC and LAL look too similar, and "LAX" is a holdover from back when they played their games near the airport.

And there was another typo there -- the no-vig money line is 220, not "2.2". Sorry about the poor quality control.