Reviewing Allen's 3 in ORL-BOS game

[theplagy]

so they're saying that they can't change it now because they didn't change it back then.


As I recall, Ben Gordon's shot in the first half in that 3OT game was reviewed and given an extra point later in the second half.

Or am I wrong?

[paco]

so they're saying that they can't change it now because they didn't change it back then.


As I recall, Ben Gordon's shot in the first half in that 3OT game was reviewed and given an extra point later in the second half.

Or am I wrong?

I hsve ray prop over 2!!

[secret007]

they did change the decision and changed 2 points to 3 points that night.. and which one of these referee is "correct"? i have no clue about what the rule is..

[theplagy]

so how does that apply to .. let say 1st half wager?

[NBA Hero]

need to change it within the game preferably after just a few possession. in the chi game, it was changed at 4th quarter

[theplagy]

i mean what would the books do if the scenario was change from winner wagers to loser like by a half point .

you know?

[kmarinouofm]

i would win in this situation.. i had celtics +4 ... i pushed.. i would go from am push to a win

[theplagy]

my point is if that 3 by gordon changed from 2 pts to 3 pts and the additional 1 point effect the outcome of the first half wager (either from celts to bulls or under to over), how would the book handle it.

cuz the first half wager will be settled at half time.

but those zebras made the correction like 2 hrs later and gave the bulls another point in 4th Q.


However, in game 5 ORL-BOS they refused to deduct a point from Boston because too much time has passed.

just dont get it