Nba 2016-17

[mlb]

Season: 221-191-10 (+23.06u)

Season: 228-194-10 (+29.46u)

[mlb]

Just announced no patterson for them raptors, doesnt really change the outlook imo bol

thanks yeah apparently it didnt!

[mlb]

Orlando +6 (2u)
New York Knicks +6 (2u)

[mlb]

Boston -11.5 (4u)
Miami +2.5 (2u)
Mia lak U 214 (2u)
Sac +3 (2u)
Sac lac O 211 (2u)
Brook +13.5 (2u)

[mlb]

Mil nyk O 213.5 (3u)

[mlb]

Bos 2h -10 (3u)

[mlb]

chicago +2.5 (2u)
dallas +2.5 (2u)
NYK +7 (2u)

[mlb]

New orl +7.5 (2u)

[mlb]

mia lac O 207 (2u)

[mlb]

toronto +3 (2.5u)

[mlb]

new orl nyk O 215 (2u)
new orl +4.5 (2u)
dallas +4.5 (2u)

[mlb]

charlotte +9.5 (3u)
atl -7.5 (2u)

[mlb]

Chicago +11 (2u)
boston +5 (2u)
milwaukee +10.5 (1u)
la lakers +2.5 (2u)
lal port U 224 (2u)
det sac U 206 (2u)

[mlb]

Season: 228-194-10 (+29.46u)

Season: 240-209-10 (+19.71u)

[MikeyPicks1]

Dang, I was hoping to see you up like 70 units. You were crushing it early on. It was the same thing last season, wasn't it? I mean, you were up large and then hit a few rough weeks that brought it back down to earth. I wonder if it's a case of unit management? I haven't gone through your thread but am suspecting you're losing some of your bigger plays, whereas those should, in all likelihood, be your bread and butter. I myself had this problem back when I first got into the game. A vet saw what I was doing and gave me a piece of advice that turned things around for me. It was simply, "No one game, is worth twice as much as any other game." That's just to say, if you have a 1 unit play, there shouldn't exist a 2 unit play. Or another example, you have up to a 3 unit play, there shouldn't exist a 6 unit play, and so on. This all might be something you've heard before, I just figured I'd mention it though, just in case. You obviously put work in, and are a winning capper, just appears that something changes around the mid-point. Good luck, and I hope to see you swing that total back up to the ceiling before the end of the season.

[mlb]

Orlando +10.5 (3u)
Houston -3.5 (2u)
nyk phil O 209 (2u)
wash bos O 217.5 (2u)
okc mem O 204 (2u)
orl lac U 208.5 (2u)

[mlb]

ind den U 226 (3u)
den +5 (2u)

[mlb]

Dang, I was hoping to see you up like 70 units. You were crushing it early on. It was the same thing last season, wasn't it? I mean, you were up large and then hit a few rough weeks that brought it back down to earth. I wonder if it's a case of unit management? I haven't gone through your thread but am suspecting you're losing some of your bigger plays, whereas those should, in all likelihood, be your bread and butter. I myself had this problem back when I first got into the game. A vet saw what I was doing and gave me a piece of advice that turned things around for me. It was simply, "No one game, is worth twice as much as any other game." That's just to say, if you have a 1 unit play, there shouldn't exist a 2 unit play. Or another example, you have up to a 3 unit play, there shouldn't exist a 6 unit play, and so on. This all might be something you've heard before, I just figured I'd mention it though, just in case. You obviously put work in, and are a winning capper, just appears that something changes around the mid-point. Good luck, and I hope to see you swing that total back up to the ceiling before the end of the season.

Thanks for stopping by. Yes, I am trying to be more discipline in sticking with more consistent plays. I have some guys on here that we have put together certain auto plays that historically have done well and we play those at higher amounts. With that said, I am negative on the season with those, but I've been more consistent in all around capping this year. I hear what you are saying and I'm definitely keeping that in mind for plays that do not fit my certain criteria. Thanks and best of luck on your thread as well.

[Conqueror]

Auto plays that worked so well in the past aren't doing well this season. For instance, Warriors ATS (1Q) was like daily bread in the first half of last season. That hasn't worked well this season.

[mlb]

Auto plays that worked so well in the past aren't doing well this season. For instance, Warriors ATS (1Q) was like daily bread in the first half of last season. That hasn't worked well this season.

Understood. We had a couple that were great for years and we have put some filters on them and they were positive even last year. They have started slow in prior years as well. I'll stick with them until they fail me for a year and even then I'll see what tweaks we need to make. Thanks for the pop in!

[mlb]

And agreed, but just taking a team in an every game spot is not the type of auto we are playing.

[mlb]

ind den 2h U 112 (1.5u)

[mlb]

nyk chi U 207 (2u)
dal pho O 206 (2u)

[mlb]

gs -13 (2u)
nyk -3 (2u)

[mlb]

gs 1q -4.5 -115 (1u)
gs 1h -7.5 (1u)

[mlb]

curry over pts reb ass 37 -120 (1u)
green over red ass 17 -115 (1u)

[mlb]

Season: 240-209-10 (+19.71u)

Season: 250-216-10 (+24.81u)

[mlb]

brook tor O 224 (2u)
brook +15.5 (2u)
utah -8.5 (4u)
bos atl U 211 (2u)
miami +7 (1u)
orlando +7.5 (2u)
mil mia O 204.5 (2u)

[mlb]

Memphis +8 (3u)

[mlb]

Sacramento +7 (3u)
Utah -10.5 (2u) add
Miami +7.5 (1u) add
Boston +2.5 (1.5u)

[mlb]

Boston ml +125 (.5u)
Miami ml +275 (.5u)
Orlando +275 (.5u)
Memphis +255 (.5u)

[mlb]

Minnesota +2 (1.5u)
Cle Chad ml par +104 (2u)

[mlb]

phoenix +12.5 (2u)
orl utah O 195 (3u)
sas pho U 215 (2u)

[mlb]

Season: 250-216-10 (+24.81u)

Season: 264-221-10 (+44.89u)

[mlb]

det lak U 213.5 (2u)
minn dal O 195.5 (2u)
chi mem O 192 (2u)
okc sac U 213 (2u)
ny tor O 218 (2u)