- Boston did about as well as they are capable of, got off to a hot 31-pt 1st quarter,
and still lost by a wide margin.. the Cavs were "ok", kind of a slow start, judging by
the performances and what they are capable of on an indiv. basis.
- Cleveland can stick to the formula, manage the point differential and simply flip the switch
anytime they want vs. this Boston team. They dominate at so many aspects of the game that
it's virtually impossible for Boston to find a way to KEEP the Cavs under their heels, whether
it's at TD Garden or on the planet Mars, doesn't matter. There isn't a fan in the stands who
can get in the heads of the Cavs.. it's just not going to happen. Cleveland will go for the
momentum and early rest, especially because Chicago may be getting early rest, and if Chicago
doesn't, and loses 1 or 2 in Milwaukee, that's just more to Cavs advantage.
- at 100 odds, given any reason to do so the bet will be profitably hedgable after a Gm 3 victory.
the Brooms at even money. above average size, but not ballistic.
and still lost by a wide margin.. the Cavs were "ok", kind of a slow start, judging by
the performances and what they are capable of on an indiv. basis.
- Cleveland can stick to the formula, manage the point differential and simply flip the switch
anytime they want vs. this Boston team. They dominate at so many aspects of the game that
it's virtually impossible for Boston to find a way to KEEP the Cavs under their heels, whether
it's at TD Garden or on the planet Mars, doesn't matter. There isn't a fan in the stands who
can get in the heads of the Cavs.. it's just not going to happen. Cleveland will go for the
momentum and early rest, especially because Chicago may be getting early rest, and if Chicago
doesn't, and loses 1 or 2 in Milwaukee, that's just more to Cavs advantage.
- at 100 odds, given any reason to do so the bet will be profitably hedgable after a Gm 3 victory.
the Brooms at even money. above average size, but not ballistic.
.gif "Poker(1)")
