Dallas ML -350. Win
Portland TT over 97. Loss
Sacramento TT over 97. Loss
118-103-2 + 4.7.
Day complete: 1-2
Portland TT over 97. Loss
Sacramento TT over 97. Loss
118-103-2 + 4.7.
Day complete: 1-2
-
-
Morning Mag
Good whack for you last night and unlucky on your Sac play. I was just looking at your Dallas ML at
-350, how did you manage that? I had it at north of 400 – 425? - from William Hills. Did you need that
revolver to get the better line? Lol How did the Mavs look last night? I just monitored scores and
the seemed to be comfortable all night and I think they pushed the spread too?Comment -
You know, I didn't even have a chance to research much yesterday, busy all day. I knew I wanted Dallas since Wednesday, the other two were an after thought at the last minute, stupid me. Should have stuck with just the one wager. Same as today, haven't even looked yet. At least I won the most important game. LOL. Talk to you later when I see who's playing. LOL. Got the Dallas line @ say around 8PM, use 5 Dimes, at 7:10 PM that was the line then I think it went to -370. During the day it was higher.Comment -
Im finishing Up hockey plays and sniffing around for a little NBA, have a look at Wizz bounce back? It screams Atlanta again today too after the lastest complete kicking of the Raptors last night but how big can their bubble get!! lol I keep hitting which is the only way to ride a streaking team and hey if they burst I cant imagine they dont restart. Speak shortlyComment -
Leaning over in the Houston game???Comment -
Im not razor sharp on totals plays so dont want to flap when I dont do to many plus when I do its often
a contrarian play ie against the run of expectation. However, Im thinking two powerful teams pushing it over? Houston has gone over 3 straight. How do you normally assess? And you seem to prefer
1st half totals over full game?Comment -
My overs thesis! Lol Here is what I would be looking at here as I dont normal look at a play in isolation Im interested in an extended period of return for the effort. Houston was over pegged at the season start which lead to a long period of under totals. Thats not an uncommon phenomanon in any sport its just the settling in process. They have subsequently had another under run of 5 which is by no means huge plus a run of 5 overs. It is normal for an NBA team to have extended totals runs each year of approx 7. I dont like to count the early season runs in this calc normally but its close. Looking at the schedule ahead you could say it sets up well for an overs run – GS/Ind/Gs/Phx/Lal/Dal – and even if they miss tonight would likely hit again during that stretch. What I also do is split my play ie can GS support an overs play subsequently as they would absorb any loss tonight. Yes is a reasonable answer to that
Comments welcome!Comment -
Always been an over guy.LOL. Can't sit there and hope nobody scores. LOL. If it looks under or iffy I usually pass, once in a while I'll take and under. More of a TT guy, sometimes like first halves if the line seems askew. For example, Boston is usually pretty good at HOME for first halves, then they have a tendency to fall apart in the second half. When I get back from the gun club hope to have a wager or two.Comment
