NBA Wednesday

[44 Mag]

NOP ML -175. Loss
Milw & Wash ML Parlay. Win
Brooklyn ML -200. Loss
Memphis @ Atlanta over 197. Loss
Utah @ Chicago over 195.5 Loss
Detroit +9.5. Win
Denver & Phoenix ML Parlay. Win
Phoenix under 215. Loss
OKC & GS ML Parlay. Loss
LAL +10.5. Loss

95-88-2.

[RollinDo]

Like the Utah-Chicago Over...can you give me your reasoning as to why you like it?
I just saw that Bulls home games have exceeded 200 lately and Jazz can score pretty well...not the same stifling defense Bulls of last season.
Thanks man!

[44 Mag]

Like the Utah-Chicago Over...can you give me your reasoning as to why you like it?
I just saw that Bulls home games have exceeded 200 lately and Jazz can score pretty well...not the same stifling defense Bulls of last season.
Thanks man!

In their last 12 home games dating back to 12/02/14 they (Chicago) are averaging 108.3 PPG. They have 3 losses in there to Dallas, GS & Brooklyn. Utah conversely in the same time frame on the road averages 97.1 PPG.

[RollinDo]

In their last 12 home games dating back to 12/02/14 they (Chicago) are averaging 108.3 PPG. They have 3 losses in there to Dallas, GS & Brooklyn. Utah conversely in the same time frame on the road averages 97.1 PPG.

Did you do the math for that? Or did you find it on a site?

[44 Mag]

Did you do the math for that? Or did you find it on a site?

Is this a quiz show ??? I do my own homework brother.

[greypimps]

rose might be out and Utah may be playing their usual slow ass pace. only way this game goes over is if Utah can put 95 on Chicago. I don't see both team is scoring much here.. Utah pretty big and can be very bad at shooting. Chicago is also a bad shooting team but it depends on how their pacing it. I say this line will go down to like 193 by tip off


rose .. Dunleavy.. noah.. are ????

[RollinDo]

Is this a quiz show ??? I do my own homework brother.

I'm not testing you bro...just curious as to how you came up with those stats...fine work I must say.

[RollinDo]

With you on Bulls Over

[44 Mag]

rose might be out and Utah may be playing their usual slow ass pace. only way this game goes over is if Utah can put 95 on Chicago. I don't see both team is scoring much here.. Utah pretty big and can be very bad at shooting. Chicago is also a bad shooting team but it depends on how their pacing it. I say this line will go down to like 193 by tip off


rose .. Dunleavy.. noah.. are ????

Well Mr. Pimp thanks for the info. I did not see anywhere, where all those guys are out or questionable??? Don't know where you get this info, but it is helpful, albeit too late. May be you are correct, but I based my opinion on much Chicago has been scoring lately. actually if you look at some of their quotes they admit to being able & willing to score more points as opposed to strictly "D". BOL. I am sticking with what I have.

[44 Mag]

With you on Bulls Over

Don't go by me, EVER. Also, last Wednesday swept the afternoon board, Friday night went 6-0 and Sunday 4-1. Then you "chimed" in and have been losing. Is there a pattern here????? LOL. BOL old friend, just f...... with ya.

[greypimps]

I play both side. Its on donbes Report

[44 Mag]

I play both side. Its on donbes Report

WTF does this mean???? Speak English.

[billily]

mag you dont have to answer those questions... you are the men (y)... i follow you..

[Emf66]

I would be careful on the Utah over they just finished going under 7 straight games which I was monitoring, I finally took them on Monday and sweated out a total which went well over but only due to a splurge of last minute points. Prior to that they were sitting 5-6+ points below the total. I haven't decided whether they will now "rebound" from the stretch or continue it. As someone mentioned their shooting can be absolutely dire. BOL

[44 Mag]

I would be careful on the Utah over they just finished going under 7 straight games which I was monitoring, I finally took them on Monday and sweated out a total which went well over but only due to a splurge of last minute points. Prior to that they were sitting 5-6+ points below the total. I haven't decided whether they will now "rebound" from the stretch or continue it. As someone mentioned their shooting can be absolutely dire. BOL

I am not banking on Utah, I am betting on Chicago. Their totals lately speak volumes. Question: do you folks think that Utah cannot score more than 88-89 points???? I suggest they score approximately 92. Hence the over. Anyway, BOL to all. BY the way, they have only scored less than 87 points 3x all season.

[44 Mag]

BY the way, Chicago's last 13 out of 17 have gone over (195), not a bad option. Whatever, it goes over it goes over if not it is a loss for me and you guys get to revel in your glory I guess.

[Emf66]

relax, Im just advising on relevant info because I had been focusing on that teams totals for 2 weeks. Im not saying its a bad play either just be aware of the Utah influence

[Emf66]

in passing, I think someone on here complained that a recent Orlando game had been fixed because of 16 last minute points? In the Utah game Monday I recall their being 18

[Emf66]

their = there lol

[44 Mag]

in passing, I think someone on here complained that a recent Orlando game had been fixed because of 16 last minute points? In the Utah game Monday I recall their being 18

Well buddy, I don't buy that "fixed" sports thing, in any sport, they are just sore losers. Hey, I lose , we all lose at some point, but you will never see or hear me saying it is fixed, that is just ridiculous.

[Calgunner23]

in passing, I think someone on here complained that a recent Orlando game had been fixed because of 16 last minute points? In the Utah game Monday I recall their being 18

I think you are referring to the game against the Nets. I bet that game and they didn't cover the -2.5 due to that unexpected run from Orlando. Major burn!

[44 Mag]

I think you are referring to the game against the Nets. I bet that game and they didn't cover the -2.5 due to that unexpected run from Orlando. Major burn!

Well fella's, you are both new here @ SBR, but, I still don't buy into the fixed game theory, EVER. BOL to you both and watch out for the haters on here. LOL.

[Emf66]

Well fella's, you are both new here @ SBR, but, I still don't buy into the fixed game theory, EVER. BOL to you both and watch out for the haters on here. LOL.

lol, my comment wasn't support for the "fixed" idea I was actualy trying to explain that its not uncommon.

[GIVEMETHEMONEY]

What happened to your Utah Chicago over they didn't come anywhere close!!

[greypimps]

WTF does this mean???? Speak English.

I play bookie and bettor as well... I do have some info on players here and there but it not 100% accurate.