i want the truth, did anyone do sac ml

[ryanXL977]

for a decent sized bet
show me some proof
this is why you never ever ever lay -1000 in a game in any sport, ever, even at home

its just brain dead

see: usc vs oregon state

[Wilforth]

I wish I did. I haven't read any thread anywhere to that effect.

[ryanXL977]

never saw it coming
even the best teams have off nights
never ever ever take a favorite of anything over 300, at most
ever

[unit1884]

This is the second time these assholes Sacramento Kings have fked me when I took the Lakers ML, same thing happened last year, they beat the lakers by 1

[jtnguyen79]

why is sac the a hole?

you know how many times LA Lakers have screwed me in 2nd half????

blow out leads last 2 times and then fvck me in ass

well pay back is a fvcking bitch and thank god they will lose too if you cant win and cover then dont win at all

I wish I had money line but I avoided the whole game I bet 2nd half and only in a parlay

[The_Kid]

To be honest, Lakers have always had trouble up at Arco. As seen on their recent road trip on the East Coast, they do struggle with teams below .500 records. The Lakers play down to the competition and it came back to bite them today. They just didn't have it from the tip-off and you could tell that the Kings were ready take it to them.

[ryanXL977]

why would you take lal ml? why

[unit1884]

I am sitting here asking myself the same question, It didnt even increase the payout on my parlay much...

Dumb move on my part, but I thought it would cover easily, just like Cavs ML...

[EBDOG]

i took the spread but no ml

[VegasDave]

-1000, the break-even point is 91%.

91 X 100 = 9100
9 X 1000 = 9000

This was one of those losses. If you lose 9 or less -1000s for every 100 you bet, you will win long term.

[unit1884]

It was actually -900

[bigugly]

I had Lakers to cover. They got owned. I would much rather see that than a close cover.

[NardVa]

It's funny how I thought they had a chance to beat Utah and Denver at home straight up the two previous games with Martin playing but the Kings lost. Now they play the Lakers at home with no Kevin Martin and they win. Can't believe it.

[Sloanie29]

I had SAC +12.5 and over 212.5...squeaked by on that one

[Fuerza]

Hi Guys,

I rarely post though i have been reading this thread for about a year now. I actually took Sac ML last night on a 4 play parlay. I am not sure how to post proof other than copy and past but if you guys know a better way please let me know. If 1 more point would have been scored I would have made 7k. Oh well. Maybe I will start posting.

Cheers



[#49328692] PARLAY (4 TEAMS) (Risking: 100.00 - To Win: 7,243.92) WIN
12/09/2008 - 07:12 PM NBA [515] ORLANDO +160
Score: ORLANDO(109) - PORTLAND(108) WIN
12/09/2008 - 07:12 PM NBA [518] SACRAMENTO +675
Score: LA LAKERS(101) - SACRAMENTO(113) WIN
12/09/2008 - 07:12 PM NBA [1515] TOTAL o96½-110
(1H ORLANDO vrs 1H PORTLAND)
Score: 1H ORLANDO(49) - 1H PORTLAND(48) WIN
12/09/2008 - 07:12 PM NBA [1517] TOTAL o107-110
(1H LA LAKERS vrs 1H SACRAMENTO)
Score: 1H LA LAKERS(51) - 1H SACRAMENTO(56) PUSH
3,746.82

[bigugly]

You don't seem pissed off enough to have missed this parlay by 1 point. What's wrong with you?