who's worst BOS or LAL
hard to beleave this was the finqls 3 seasons ago in 2010. Me personally i say the celtics..they have way more TALENT than LA. I mean lets all be real here after LA's starting 5 they have nothing. While bos on the other hand has the jet, sullenger, green and a hall of fame coach and their still under .500 IN THE EAST lol put em the west they'd have the kings rec lol saw what happend on their 4 gm west coast road trip last month. Lakers arent even that bad, they just have bad coaching. If phil jackson was caoching this team theyd be 10gms better look what happend when Dantoni left NY. PLEASE PPL CHIME IN im curious to see what yall think
-
-
Right now you can't compare organizations. Celtics have a much better front office. Boston will be in the thick if it at the end like they always are.Comment -
thick of it my ass they will be an 7-8th seed at best which means mia/ind/chi (knicks will lose div to brk) they lose in 5 max lol and thats being nice and thats if they make the playoffsComment -
Boston have a much better chance @ the playoffs. Boston > LALComment -
Boston will struggle more next season with KG and PP being another year older.
Anyway, they will not win anything with his group. Just a waste of time to keep KG and PP.Comment -
I think Lakers are much worse. I also think they are far more talented than the Celtics. The Celtics have only 3 really good guys. Two of them is old and the other one is inconsistent. Also the Celtics were this bad the same time last year but they still made it to the ECF and just 1 game away to reach the finals.Comment
