Wow. Absolutely wow is all I can say about this opener. This is a noon game between two teams who play the same brand of basketball and have the same strengths. The pace for this one should be around 85 or lower, which means for a 7 point win the Grizzlies would need to be 10 points more efficient than the Pacers. This line is just bogus. I was on the Grizz to beat the Pacers on new years eve and even though they lost I know they were up most of the game, but George Hill wasn't playing that one. These teams should be at most - 1 in a neutral court for the Grizz and they opened them as 7 point favourites in a game where they have 0 matchup advantages and only the revenge factor on their side (no fatigues, no nothing else).
I would play the Pacers + 7 just for how slow the game should be and how much better the Grizz actually would need to be to get more than a 7 point win here, but because I also don't see any matchup advantage or other reason for the line I am thinking about playing 3 units on the Pacers for my biggest bet of the year. Anyone will please show me where I'm wrong or what I am missing?
I would play the Pacers + 7 just for how slow the game should be and how much better the Grizz actually would need to be to get more than a 7 point win here, but because I also don't see any matchup advantage or other reason for the line I am thinking about playing 3 units on the Pacers for my biggest bet of the year. Anyone will please show me where I'm wrong or what I am missing?