Since the totals is so low, should I buy the under?
-
-
Id definitely be going with the over on that game...the number is way too lowComment -
Played with 95$ on under and won app 90$. Extremely low totals = underComment -
Similar situation with Bulls and Celtics tonight opened at 182
Auto play underComment -
182 is a little bit high for my taste. Last week I also played under Indiana Phi at 182 early, it dropped to 180.5 through day and match ended 95-85 total at 180.
Not very sure about todays game. If it was 179.5 again it was an autoplay.Comment -
Dropped to 181.5 already
Why wait until it goes lower if you can grab a better number now?Comment -
Bro you misunderstood. To be an autoplay, at least for me, the totals should be very low, like everone should say this game will be 100% over. My fav totals is around 180 and under 180. For overs, 212-215... If I would play this game it will be under, but it is not an autoplay for me.
A month ago the totals for Boston-Chicago was 184.5, the game ended with 196 points and Boston win. Today Rose out, I expect an under but I am not 95-100% sure as I would be with a lower total.Comment -
What is your confidence on your under play?Comment -
Two defensive minded teams
Bulls at home have been straigh cash this year -- 11 of 13 home bulls games have stayed under including the last 7 in a row. Granted 1 of the 2 overs was against Boston, but playing Bulls Unders at home has been extremely profitableComment -
Chicago is 2-11 o/u in it's home plays... Celtics stands 5/6 at it's road plays...What does 7-17 combination give you? Tren works up to the point and then it explodes
Boston has played under 4 out it's last 6 on the road...
So knowing all this , which one would you take ?
Comment -
overChicago is 2-11 o/u in it's home plays... Celtics stands 5/6 at it's road plays...What does 7-17 combination give you? Tren works up to the point and then it explodes Boston has played under 4 out it's last 6 on the road...
So knowing all this , which one would you take ?Comment