Did that 2 by New Orleans change the total/2H total

hawley · 12-16-12, 11:29 PM

Think pinnacle closed at 92

Romerowned · 12-16-12, 11:30 PM

I believe the over under for the second half was 92 so it made a push?

Romerowned · 12-16-12, 11:31 PM

Perhaps Monty Williams bought the second half total at over 91.5

HoulihansTX · 12-16-12, 11:32 PM

807 NEW ORLEANS @ 808 PORTLAND
		NEW ORLEANS	PORTLAND
Pointspread
12/16 7:16:20p	Pincle	-1+102	+1-112
12/16 7:09:37p	Pincle	-1-101	+1-109
12/16 7:06:24p	Pincle	-½-113	+½+102
12/16 7:06:17p	Pincle	-½-112	+½+102
12/16 7:05:19p	Pincle	-½-107	+½-103
12/16 7:04:54p	Pincle	-½-102	+½-108
12/16 7:03:34p	Pincle	-½-105	+½-105
12/16 7:02:32p	Pincle	-½+100	+½-110
Total
12/16 7:14:34p	Pincle	o91½-105	u91½-105
12/16 7:13:30p	Pincle	o91-112	u91+102
12/16 7:10:58p	Pincle	o91-109	u91-101
12/16 7:10:54p	Pincle	o91-108	u91-102
12/16 7:10:24p	Pincle	o91-107	u91-103
12/16 7:09:50p	Pincle	o91½+100	u91½-110
12/16 7:09:45p	Pincle	o91½+102	u91½-112
12/16 7:08:52p	Pincle	o91½-101	u91½-109
12/16 7:08:48p	Pincle	o91½+101	u91½-111
12/16 7:08:32p	Pincle	o91½-102	u91½-108
12/16 7:07:31p	Pincle	o91½-105	u91½-105
12/16 7:07:20p	Pincle	o91½-104	u91½-106
12/16 7:07:17p	Pincle	o91½-107	u91½-103
12/16 7:07:08p	Pincle	o91½-106	u91½-104
12/16 7:06:53p	Pincle	o91½-109	u91½-101
12/16 7:06:35p	Pincle	o91½-110	u91½+100
12/16 7:06:20p	Pincle	o91½-107	u91½-103
12/16 7:06:15p	Pincle	o91½-105	u91½-105
12/16 7:05:58p	Pincle	o91½-108	u91½-102
12/16 7:05:39p	Pincle	o91½-107	u91½-103
12/16 7:05:11p	Pincle	o91½-104	u91½-106
12/16 7:05:06p	Pincle	o91½-106	u91½-104
12/16 7:05:03p	Pincle	o91½-102	u91½-108
12/16 7:04:50p	Pincle	o91½-105	u91½-105
12/16 7:04:36p	Pincle	o91½-102	u91½-108
12/16 7:04:16p	Pincle	o91½+100	u91½-110
12/16 7:04:10p	Pincle	o92+103	u92-114
12/16 7:03:58p	Pincle	o92+101	u92-111
12/16 7:03:42p	Pincle	o92-102	u92-108
12/16 7:02:38p	Pincle	o92-105	u92-105

Seto · 12-16-12, 11:34 PM

wow. that's flat out disgusting.

cockblocker · 12-17-12, 12:17 AM

91 at Heritage

brainfreeze0 · 12-17-12, 12:54 AM

Everyones always screaming rigged. Both Austin Rivers and Lilliards last 2 shots were low % 3 ptrs and even more low % with the coverage on them. Then NO throws it inbounds to the only guy not being heavily guarded with .3 seconds left and the 5 seconds running out fast. Did you expect him to try and run outside the arc or just catch it and and just stand there since he was not going to make a 3. Of course he's going to put it up if not just to score but out of instinct. Ok I'm gonna catch it and just walk off the court because I can't make a 3. These rigged convos are just retarded.

Do ppl really think the o/u totals are playing on these NBA players minds "oh I'd better miss this shot to keep the score low" "well better start chucking up 3's to make sure the total goes over" "oh wait a minute I need to miss this layup to make sure the gambling degenerates don't make the -4 1/2 pts" "oh let me chunck up this shot 6 ft behind the arc with 2 seconds left to kill the under" lol. Only degens think like this its laughable.

Romerowned · 12-17-12, 01:46 AM

I do wonder though if the spreads do influence the play sometimes. I think if I was an NBA player the spreads would be on the back of my mind.

Seto · 12-17-12, 02:12 AM

Originally posted by brainfreeze0

Everyones always screaming rigged. Both Austin Rivers and Lilliards last 2 shots were low % 3 ptrs and even more low % with the coverage on them. Then NO throws it inbounds to the only guy not being heavily guarded with .3 seconds left and the 5 seconds running out fast. Did you expect him to try and run outside the arc or just catch it and and just stand there since he was not going to make a 3. Of course he's going to put it up if not just to score but out of instinct. Ok I'm gonna catch it and just walk off the court because I can't make a 3. These rigged convos are just retarded.

Do ppl really think the o/u totals are playing on these NBA players minds "oh I'd better miss this shot to keep the score low" "well better start chucking up 3's to make sure the total goes over" "oh wait a minute I need to miss this layup to make sure the gambling degenerates don't make the -4 1/2 pts" "oh let me chunck up this shot 6 ft behind the arc with 2 seconds left to kill the under" lol. Only degens think like this its laughable.

Yeah, keep believing games are never rigged.

I'm not one to scream rigged in most cases but this one is pretty hard to think any other way of. I'd rather at least try to inbound the ball to a guy standing somewhere where he can shoot a 3 even if there is a 99.9% chance my pass won't make it rather than pass it to the guy under the basket where my team has NO chance of winning if I do. Hell, I'd even rather have a 5 second violation called on me.

brainfreeze0 · 12-17-12, 02:16 AM

Originally posted by Seto

Yeah, keep believing games are never rigged.

I'm not one to scream rigged in most cases but this one is pretty hard to think any other way of. I'd rather at least try to inbound the ball to a guy standing somewhere where he can shoot a 3 even if there is a 99.9% chance my pass won't make it rather than pass it to the guy under the basket where my team has NO chance of winning if I do. Hell, I'd even rather have a 5 second violation called on me.

and thats why you're here on sbr and not a player or coach in the NBA. Ever heard of and 1's?

Seto · 12-17-12, 04:45 AM

Originally posted by brainfreeze0

and thats why you're here on sbr and not a player or coach in the NBA. Ever heard of and 1's?

i know NBA players are dumb, but foul under the basket in that situation? come on.

nbafanatic2012 · 12-17-12, 05:31 AM

Originally posted by brainfreeze0

Everyones always screaming rigged. Both Austin Rivers and Lilliards last 2 shots were low % 3 ptrs and even more low % with the coverage on them. Then NO throws it inbounds to the only guy not being heavily guarded with .3 seconds left and the 5 seconds running out fast. Did you expect him to try and run outside the arc or just catch it and and just stand there since he was not going to make a 3. Of course he's going to put it up if not just to score but out of instinct. Ok I'm gonna catch it and just walk off the court because I can't make a 3. These rigged convos are just retarded.

Do ppl really think the o/u totals are playing on these NBA players minds "oh I'd better miss this shot to keep the score low" "well better start chucking up 3's to make sure the total goes over" "oh wait a minute I need to miss this layup to make sure the gambling degenerates don't make the -4 1/2 pts" "oh let me chunck up this shot 6 ft behind the arc with 2 seconds left to kill the under" lol. Only degens think like this its laughable.

well put....but when the numbers land so close to the target and it goes the wrong way, you can do nothing but feel that its been rigged...lets just say the o/u was 188 and you had the under, then you see the hornets drop that 2 point bucket for no apparent reason. I mean common, what the heck was the sense in that. I mean even if they are rigged, there are only 2 sides and our job is to figure out how to get on the rigged side.

brainfreeze0 · 12-17-12, 02:40 PM

Originally posted by Seto

i know NBA players are dumb, but foul under the basket in that situation? come on.

As opposed to taking a 5 second violation and losing it for good or passing it to the heavily guarded player who will either have it knocked back out of bounds with less time leaving no time for a shot, having it stolen, or so guarded you have no shot in .3 seconds, it's your only play with that amount of time.