This will be an experiment that I would like to attempt beginning this NBA season.
Once again this is only an experiment so we may end up making a bit of money of lose a ton...I simply don't know.
Everybody who decides to lay a bet on a certain play has their own opinion to justify their play. Fair enough.
Yet there's always going to be someone who would disagree and will have their take on the opposite play.
So far we agree that there will be no consensus on handicapping...that's just human nature.
We have people who spend hours and hours capping games but ends up in the red at the end
while some of us just follows blindly without much knowledge but comes out in the black.
Is there really a true and quantifiable advantage to capping?
Some of us use the knowledge to fade the public while others will flock to put money on the favorite.
In essence, sports betting is gambling. One will never know the end result regardless of the amount of knowledge.
Guys in here always says it's better to flip a coin, draw a card, roll a dice or even let their dog decide the
plays to have a better chance at winning than to follow so and so handicapper. Is that a fact or fallacy?
Because of that, I am going to completely remove the human aspect of handicapping.
Simply put, through the use of a programmed random number generator: the game, the type of bet and the unit sizes will be completely randomly selected without any sort of handicapping, information, knowledge or bias. It will be completely unpredictable and random.
Details on next post...
Once again this is only an experiment so we may end up making a bit of money of lose a ton...I simply don't know.
Everybody who decides to lay a bet on a certain play has their own opinion to justify their play. Fair enough.
Yet there's always going to be someone who would disagree and will have their take on the opposite play.
So far we agree that there will be no consensus on handicapping...that's just human nature.
We have people who spend hours and hours capping games but ends up in the red at the end
while some of us just follows blindly without much knowledge but comes out in the black.
Is there really a true and quantifiable advantage to capping?
Some of us use the knowledge to fade the public while others will flock to put money on the favorite.
In essence, sports betting is gambling. One will never know the end result regardless of the amount of knowledge.
Guys in here always says it's better to flip a coin, draw a card, roll a dice or even let their dog decide the
plays to have a better chance at winning than to follow so and so handicapper. Is that a fact or fallacy?
Because of that, I am going to completely remove the human aspect of handicapping.
Simply put, through the use of a programmed random number generator: the game, the type of bet and the unit sizes will be completely randomly selected without any sort of handicapping, information, knowledge or bias. It will be completely unpredictable and random.
Details on next post...
.