I had wagers on both sides of a Warcraft 3 match this morning for HawK vs Blade.
It appears that one player (Blade) did not show up for the event. Bet365 graded it as void, while Betcris graded it as a win for HawK.
This worked out in my favour as I backed HawK on cris, but I'm wondering if my win is within the rules for both books. It appears that Bet365's eSports rules has a "non-runner no bet" clause, while cris does not. Should I confirm with cris about the grading before betting with these winnings?
EDIT: It appears that cris has now voided/refunded as well, which is fair.
It appears that one player (Blade) did not show up for the event. Bet365 graded it as void, while Betcris graded it as a win for HawK.
This worked out in my favour as I backed HawK on cris, but I'm wondering if my win is within the rules for both books. It appears that Bet365's eSports rules has a "non-runner no bet" clause, while cris does not. Should I confirm with cris about the grading before betting with these winnings?
EDIT: It appears that cris has now voided/refunded as well, which is fair.