Originally posted by Jasiek
Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)
Collapse
X
-
skyscrapersSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-02-11
- 6190
#3991If Florida can beat SJ straight up in SJ then anything can happen.Comment -
EwilSBR Rookie
- 03-19-14
- 2
#3992Shouldn't Toronto be (+1½) ?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#3993What do the rules say at the bottom of my post?Originally posted by EwilShouldn't Toronto be (+1½) ?Comment -
EwilSBR Rookie
- 03-19-14
- 2
#3994Toronto is dog and the V1 rules say we should bet P/LComment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#3995I knew you could do it! Good job.Originally posted by EwilToronto is dog and the V1 rules say we should bet P/LComment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#3996Come on. Not again... Is it really hrd to cover damn P/L ?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#3997Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 192-6 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +59.51 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-13.65 units)
(3/19/14):
#200 Toronto (+1½) v1 (A) - Loss
#201 Chicago (M/L) v1 (A) - Win
v1 Fades
(A) 97-43
(B) 32-9
(C) 4-5
Losses: VAN (-24.04 u), LAK (-26.60 u), PIT (-29.63 u), STL (-25.52 u), TOR (-13.89 u)
v2 Plays
(A) 39-21
(B) 11-11
(C) 9-1
Losses: DET (-12.81 u)
Games for (3/20/14):
#197 Buffalo (+1½) @ Edmonton v2 (C) (9:35 pm EST)
#199 Resumes v1 (B) on 3/21/14
#200 Tampa Bay @ Ottawa (+1½) v1 (B) (7:35 pm EST)
#202 Minnesota @ New Jersey (M/L) v2 (A) (7:05 pm EST)
#203 Washington @ L.A. Kings (M/L) v2 (A) (10:35 pm EST)
#204 Dallas (+1½) @ Philadelphia v2 (A) (7:05 pm EST)
#205 Dallas (+1½) @ Philadelphia v1 (A) (7:05 pm EST)
#206 Washington @ L.A. Kings (M/L) v1 (A) (10:35 pm EST)
#207 Columbus (+1½) @ Montreal v1 (A) (7:35 pm EST)
Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#3998Only when you lose by 2 or more.Originally posted by JasiekCome on. Not again... Is it really hrd to cover damn P/L ?Comment -
hagball52SBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3053
#3999Dang Wallco lots of action today. Quick question, have you or anyone else started the JM MLB thread for this season?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4000Just did. I don't play it but here it is.Originally posted by hagball52Dang Wallco lots of action today. Quick question, have you or anyone else started the JM MLB thread for this season?
Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4001A huge deposit coming in. Good luck everybody.Comment -
Ace-bryanSBR Rookie
- 03-08-14
- 2
#4002For tonights game #200. Looks like Tampa is +1.5 pucks not Ottawa. So should be going on the ML correct?Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4003According to some news, Sabres are going to test a new goalie once again and I think I already know what does it mean...
Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4004What do the rules say at the bottom of my post?Originally posted by Ace-bryanFor tonights game #200. Looks like Tampa is +1.5 pucks not Ottawa. So should be going on the ML correct?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4005Yeah, I think I heard the same thing when Martin Brodeur got his first start!Originally posted by JasiekAccording to some news, Sabres are going to test a new goalie once again and I think I already know what does it mean...
Comment -
tonywayneSBR High Roller
- 11-05-13
- 229
#4006Originally posted by Wallco99What do the rules say at the bottom of my post?
Come on, Wallco. You're the "admin" of this system. If the odds changed or if you posted incorrectly, fix it - either in the main post for the day or at least in some kind of follow up. Your little "read the rules" game is getting tiresome (and doesn't help any newbies that are trying to get a hang of the system). Be HELPFUL, not CONDESCENDING...Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4007*****Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4008Hey Mr know-it-all, in case you haven't checked, the line I have posted IS correct. Whenever mistakes are made, I usually do fix them instantly, ask Maxi_EV, he knows I do. But as teams switching back and forth from favorite to dog all day long, that is not a mistake in my post, that just happens. I usually will correct them when I get home at night, but I am not going to sit at computer all day long and watch line movements. I could have said "Yes, play the M/L", however, that advice would have been incorrect at this particular moment in time now wouldn't it? I mean, since they are the dog again. Not to mention, the next time this scenario arises, he would be right back in here with the same question. Now that he has been directed to the rule, and read it for himself, he understands that. For Christ's sake, I post the answer to that question EVERY DAY at the bottom of the plays post. Don't tell me what my responsibilities are on here, until I start drawing a salary to post these plays and put up with bullshit like yours, then I will update when I get a chance to do so. I am not changing the post 5 times. If a line switches and either team becomes a clear favorite, one that I don't feel will switch back, at that time I will usually make my changes. But until that time, read the rule I have posted and decide what you are going to do for yourself if you can't wait for a clear favorite to be determined. The "read the rules game" wouldn't be getting tiresome if they would just READ THE RULES!Originally posted by tonywayneCome on, Wallco. You're the "admin" of this system. If the odds changed or if you posted incorrectly, fix it - either in the main post for the day or at least in some kind of follow up. Your little "read the rules" game is getting tiresome (and doesn't help any newbies that are trying to get a hang of the system). Be HELPFUL, not CONDESCENDING...Comment -
Ace-bryanSBR Rookie
- 03-08-14
- 2
#4009Wallco99, Yep I should of read the rules closer, I imagine with your number of posts you have to repeatedly answer the same question. New at following your system, and confused myself, Was looking for confirmation as Ottawa was on a 4 game losing streak instead of the 2 chase game against Tampa, but wasn't sure how many of those losses were ATS. Wanted to be sure it was Ottawa. Have to get better at keeping my stats. Cheers.Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4010Ace-bryan, Ottawa is a dog now as you can see.
BAD. Senators
Comment -
cadetdukeSBR Hustler
- 02-23-13
- 65
#4011I'm reloaded and back. Made some really stupid mistakes in sports I don't follow 3 months ago lol
Happy to be back in the one sport I really know and the only thread on this forum I follow.
Oh and one month ago this past Monday my wife gave birth to our first child.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4012No problem. I was not trying to be rude by asking what the rule read. It was easier to type that than retype the whole rule again, and by that, you now fully understand it. There was no way I could confirm your question, that is why I wanted you to read the ENTIRE rule. And I am glad I didn't say "yes" at that time, had I did you may have bet M/L and lost the bet tonight. The only person bothered by this is TonyWayne, and that is too damn bad for him. AS for you, I hope you ended on the +1 1/2, since you see how frequently lines can change in this sport, and when lines are as close as they were, I would wait as long as possible to place wager.Originally posted by Ace-bryanWallco99, Yep I should of read the rules closer, I imagine with your number of posts you have to repeatedly answer the same question. New at following your system, and confused myself, Was looking for confirmation as Ottawa was on a 4 game losing streak instead of the 2 chase game against Tampa, but wasn't sure how many of those losses were ATS. Wanted to be sure it was Ottawa. Have to get better at keeping my stats. Cheers.Comment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#4013Would it ease your workload (and stop FAQs) if you didn't post the P/L or M/L info and just leave people to work it out for themselves in accordance with the very simple rule: P/L for dogs, M/L for favs? Just a suggestion....Originally posted by Wallco99No problem. I was not trying to be rude by asking what the rule read. It was easier to type that than retype the whole rule again, and by that, you now fully understand it. There was no way I could confirm your question, that is why I wanted you to read the ENTIRE rule. And I am glad I didn't say "yes" at that time, had I did you may have bet M/L and lost the bet tonight. The only person bothered by this is TonyWayne, and that is too damn bad for him. AS for you, I hope you ended on the +1 1/2, since you see how frequently lines can change in this sport, and when lines are as close as they were, I would wait as long as possible to place wager.Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4014
Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4015No. I posted that question last year and basically everyone said to post the lines. I think it would get asked every day that way. That is the the problem, they are not reading the rule that you are suggesting I post, which I already am posting anyway.Originally posted by Kev the BritWould it ease your workload (and stop FAQs) if you didn't post the P/L or M/L info and just leave people to work it out for themselves in accordance with the very simple rule: P/L for dogs, M/L for favs? Just a suggestion....Comment -
FiregreekSBR Rookie
- 11-19-13
- 17
#4016Boom! That's that so shut your mouth on the matter Brit man. Keep it up Wallco great season.Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4017Is Buffalo still bothering you? How did that rookie goalie work out?Originally posted by Jasiek
Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4018Kevin is one of the good guys, please delete that portion of your post. Thanks, and glad system is working for you.Originally posted by FiregreekBoom! Keep it up Wallco great season.Comment -
HeinrichIISBR High Roller
- 03-19-14
- 199
#4019Wow, excellent night yesterday, Dallas allowed a late goal and screwed up...otherwise it would have been a sweep.
Well done.
I may add that rules are extremely clear, even for me that I'm a noob in betting. Will keep more attention to this system for my bets. Thanks for this!Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4020Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 198-6 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +65.51 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-7.60 units)
(3/20/14):
#197 Buffalo (+1½) v2 (C) - Win
#200 Ottawa (+1½) v1 (B) - Win
#202 New Jersey (M/L) v2 (A) - Win
#203 L.A. Kings (M/L) v2 (A) - Win
#204 Dallas (+1½) v2 (A) - Loss
#205 Dallas (+1½) v1 (A) - Loss
#206 L.A. Kings (M/L) v1 (A) - Win
#207 Columbus (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
v1 Fades
(A) 99-44
(B) 33-9
(C) 4-5
Losses: VAN (-24.04 u), LAK (-26.60 u), PIT (-29.63 u), STL (-25.52 u), TOR (-13.89 u)
v2 Plays
(A) 41-23
(B) 11-11
(C) 10-1
Losses: DET (-12.81 u)
Games for (3/21/14):
#199 Boston @ Colorado (+1½) v1 (B) (9:05 pm EST)
#204 Resumes v2 (B) on 3/22/14
#205 Resumes v1 (B) on 3/22/14
#208 Nashville (+1½) @ Calgary v2 (A) (9:05 pm EST)
Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.
Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.Comment -
BenGooGaSBR High Roller
- 10-07-13
- 151
#4021Hey Wallco, what's the difference between v1 and v2 games?Comment -
Wallco99SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-01-11
- 7261
#4022System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.Originally posted by BenGooGaHey Wallco, what's the difference between v1 and v2 games?Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4023Not anymoreOriginally posted by Wallco99Is Buffalo still bothering you? How did that rookie goalie work out?
Comment -
parlay100SBR High Roller
- 09-23-09
- 117
#4024are you seriously this stupid?Originally posted by BenGooGaHey Wallco, what's the difference between v1 and v2 games?Comment -
JasiekSBR Rookie
- 01-22-14
- 21
#4025That was frustrating, indeed.Originally posted by HeinrichIIDallas allowed a late goal and screwed up...Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
